Interview Process: Recruiter reached out to me. Initial conversation with a member of leadership. Technical discussion with an engineer. Final rounds included a coding interview and a system design interview. Overall, the process felt unorganized. There were inconsistencies in communication regarding the interview format. I was informed that the technical rounds would focus on system design, but one of the rounds shifted to a coding exercise without prior notice. Additionally, there were delays and limited responsiveness from the recruiting side when I followed up with clarifying questions. During one of the technical interviews, there were also technical setup issues that impacted the flow of the discussion. In another interview the interviewer was late by 15 minutes. The experience felt less structured than expected, and clearer communication and preparation would have improved the overall process.

5 Rounds 1. Initial Recruiter Call | 2. Codility Screening | 3. Two Technical interviews with 1 engineer each, back to back | 4. 2nd set of two Technical interviews with 1 engineer each, back to back | 5. 1 Project manager Offer was then sent, and negotiations were done with the recruiter and CTO Everyone was friendly. The engineers in the process were smart and talented. It felt more of a conversation than an interrogation. An offer was sent, but be warned that they did pull the offer after a negotiation round with the CTO. From feedback, I believe this was due to a difference in the interpretation of vacation between Canadians and Americans. This is the first time I've seen a company do a takesy backsey. I would not consider offers from nue to be a guaranteed indication of employment and would be careful of quitting your current position.