First, I had a conversation where we discussed my background and work experience. Then, they sent me a link to review some code. The code was really poor. They also asked me to create my own version of the code and send it back. It was a simple task, so I completed it quickly and sent it later same day. They mentioned they would provide feedback after the weekend. One week after my submission, I received an email stating they would not be continuing with the interview process. They also included some comments on both the code I reviewed and the code I wrote. For the code I reviewed, it seems they had a specific expectation for how feedback should be given. Their comments focused solely on the format of my feedback, rather than its accuracy or completeness. As for the code I wrote, they provided comments, but some were inaccurate. Additionally, they expected me to add functionality based on assumptions I was expected to make and none of that were not mentioned in the task description. The only comment I cannot argue was regarding a log message that I forgot to update. I would not recommend them to anyone, and my suggestion to them is to actively work on improving their interview process and the individuals involved in it.

3 coding exercises: 2 code reviews + 1 Then interview about supposedly motivation to join the company but it is more of a political opinion check on ecology dogmas. Also the Tech Lead interviewing me had serious problems explaining the architecture, which is an alarm for such a small company. He kept repeating `technical debt` so that gives you an idea of how bad must be to work there. If you are a good engineer, you are not a lazy ecology activist and you don't want to waste time, just skip this company for good. They probably do outings to protest on G7 summits.