Skip to contentSkip to footer
  • Community
  • Jobs
  • Companies
  • Salaries
  • For Employers
      Notifications

      Loading...

      Elevate your career

      Discover your earning potential, land dream jobs, and share work-life insights anonymously.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Synoptek

      Engaged Employer

      About
      Reviews
      Pay & benefits
      Jobs
      Interviews
      Interviews
      Related searches: Synoptek reviews | Synoptek jobs | Synoptek salaries | Synoptek benefits
      Synoptek interviewsSynoptek Business Development interviewsSynoptek interview


      Glassdoor

      • About / Press
      • Awards
      • Blog
      • Research
      • Contact Us
      • Guides

      Employers

      • Free Employer Account
      • Employer Center
      • Employers Blog

      Information

      • Help
      • Guidelines
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy & Ad Choices
      • Do Not Sell Or Share My Information
      • Cookie Consent Tool
      • Security

      Work With Us

      • Advertisers
      • Careers
      Download the App

      • Browse by:
      • Companies
      • Jobs
      • Locations
      • Communities
      • Recent Posts

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls," and logo are proprietary trademarks of Glassdoor LLC.

      Company Bowl sample

      Want the inside scoop on your own company?

      Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.

      Bowls

      Get actionable career advice tailored to you by joining more bowls.

      Followed companies

      Stay ahead in opportunities and insider tips by following your dream companies.

      Job searches

      Get personalized job recommendations and updates by starting your searches.

      Business Development Interview

      Mar 16, 2026
      Anonymous Interview Candidate
      No offer
      Negative experience
      Average interview

      Application

      I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Synoptek in Feb 2026

      Interview

      A recruiter reached out to me on LinkedIn in early February. Initially, there was a lot of fuss and attention from her. She told me it was an approximately three-step interview process with the company: the Talent Acquisition Manager, the Hiring Manager, and finally the CRO. She arranged an interview with the Talent Acquisition Manager, and it went very well. The TAM was excited and told me I was moving on to speak to the CRO next. Great news, right? Then silence. I followed up with the recruiter and was told "they've been swamped!" Then I got a strange questionnaire. It was full of stuff already covered in the screening interview, the TAM interview, and my resume. I responded thoroughly, and then more silence from them. Three weeks after the interview where I was told I'd be immediately moving to the next round, and twelve days since hearing from the recruiter despite my follow-up, I emailed the TAM directly. I explained that I enjoyed our conversation and was looking forward to the next interview as she had outlined. Two days later, I got a sweetly passive aggressive email from the recruiter telling me: "They have unfortunately decided to go in a different direction. The feedback I received was that they are looking for a heavier hitter. They also mentioned that you had applied directly after we submitted your profile." My qualifications were a perfect match, but whatever, I understand that it's subjective. But what a weird thing to say regarding a "heavier hitter." Then the accusation of applying directly after being recruited? What? I never applied directly. I searched wording from the role and found a different recruiting firm had white label posted the job, typos and all, last year. I had applied to that one some four months before being approached by this recruiter. Just a waste of time, and yes that happens. They just seem like a bunch of BS-ers.

      Interview questions [1]

      Question 1

      Several of the same questions over and over.
      Answer question
      1