The interview went better than I thought. Scheduling was easy and timing worked out, but from the start, it felt like the interview was something done within a time crunch which is a rough first impression, The first round was very general, asking about past experiences and things of that nature. What struck me as a reason to leave feedback is the way the interview played out. The company was looking for someone who could provide in-house media content, yet they didn't ask for any past examples of work. Even when I explained I was willing to provide, I was told it wasn't necessary. This is overall strange, considering the interview went well. Yet I was still faced with an automated "moving on" email about a week after interviewing. I have seen a few other reviews saying position titles were a bait and switch. I think this may be another case just because it is strange to not ask for a portfolio for a job requirement that is presented as being at least 80% of your work.