employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Economic Mobility Pathways

Is this your company?

Economic Mobility Pathways reviews

3.3

51% would recommend to a friend

(51 total reviews)

Kim Janey

17% approve of CEO

50% positive business outlook

Economic Mobility Pathways has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 51 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Economic Mobility Pathways employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

51 reviews
1.0
Dec 14, 2017

SOS

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are many passionate people at the organization

Cons

Poor leadership and structure, high turnover, low morale

2.0
Feb 8, 2016

Mentor

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Amazing mission, unfortunately it is not embodied throughout day to day management. Unfortunately I really cannot offer much more in this area.

Cons

No formal on boarding. Management very inexperienced, no formal leadership training. Managers with little to no experience developing or supporting a team. Blind leading the blind. Very cliquey, if you're not part of the inner circle your skill set and background are irrelevant. Extremely high turn over due to lack of support and training. Management will cover each other to throw other employees under the bus and hide their mistakes. Integrity and owning mistakes would go a long way. Very disheartening as CEO and the mission are the draw. Once hired it's clear that department management do not live up to the vision painted to new employees at hire.

2.0
Apr 5, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Frequently hiring; have met a lot of people with a lot of talent and knowledge. The families living in the programs are great to work with.

Cons

Very high staff turnover The people deciding how the work will be done are very disconnected from the actual work (and those doing it). The "Bridge to Self-Sufficiency" is a great concept, but very poorly implemented due to unrealistic workload and expectations. The company seems to be more interested in selling this model than in actually putting it into practice.

avatar
Economic Mobility Pathways Response
7y
The EMPath direct service workload ratios vary across the organization. In our Emergency Assistance shelters the staff to participant ratio is 1:11. Yes, eleven participants to 1 mentor. In CFO and Mass LEAP, the ratio of staff to participants is between 1: 20/30. (These two programs are long-term five-year engagements; shelter programs are of shorter duration.) In the challenging Whittier Choice program four coaches have engagement with 120 to 200 families. In this program mentors serve as both specialists and generalists. Across the board, talented staff members do experience frustrations and joys. The work is human work. Self-care is integral to our internal training and practices. The organization permits and encourages flexible work schedules, vacation taking, time to reflect and change course as needed. Active listening is so important. It rivals trust as a much needed core disposition in our valuable work. Thank you for sharing. Perfection is not possible, but we strive together to achieve excellence through the advancement of collaborative feedback loops, consistent application of practice, and continuous evaluation.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 51 Reviews

Glassdoor has 54 Economic Mobility Pathways reviews submitted anonymously by Economic Mobility Pathways employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Economic Mobility Pathways is right for you.