Rewarding company mission, yet not worth the toll on mental health - Analyst APPRISE Employee Review

1.0
May 18, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Project directors and colleagues lower down the food chain are excellent, the mission of the company makes you feel good about the work you do, good pay for an NGO

Cons

During my interview I noticed something was off, and I wish I had trusted my gut. I took the position here and within the first month I knew I had made a mistake. Everyone works incredibly hard here and the job is demanding, but that's not a problem in my eyes. I know that people can work hard, accomplish great things, feel valued, expand their skill sets, and have a high quality of life all at the same time. What sets the tone for that type of work environment is management. Upper management here is toxic in a way I have never experienced before. It's that feeling of "I can't win regardless of what I do". In the beginning, you try to do your best, despite the vague instructions you were given. Inevitably, it's not exactly what management wanted, so they reprimand you. Next time, you decide to ask questions ("if I ask for clarification, I'll be able to give them exactly what they want", you naively tell yourself). You're told to either "read it again" or it's implied that you're stupid for not understanding. Have an idea for how to make things more efficient/try to contribute in a way that is innovative? Forget it, I promise that if there's a way for management to blame you for the inefficiency you're trying to help fix, they will. There's a set way that management wants things and it's not going to change. Which I guess is fine, but they frequently ask for feedback/new ideas. My suggestion is to not open your mouth. People walk on egg shells here. When the president and managing director are gone (this rarely happens, but occasionally they travel, etc), the difference is palpable. Work still gets done, but vibe is completely changed. The managing director once threw a full blown temper tantrum (slamming doors, throwing paper into the hallway). I've seen people cry in/just outside the office because of the president. The worst part is that the business model is developed for high turn over. Management hires about 5 policy analysts at a given time and they are expected to only work there for about a year-- if they make it longer, great, but the expectation is clearly people last for a year. Within my first 6 months, 3 people left (not including the temporary research assistants). For a company of about 10 analysts (research directors, senior analysts, and analysts), that's pretty crazy to me. Management doesn't have to worry about the toxic culture because they aren't interested in lowering their turnover rate. APPRISE is great if you're great at keeping your head down and you're immune to constant put-downs (or perhaps you can totally compartmentalize your work from how you feel when you leave). Otherwise, you won't make a month until you wish you were somewhere else.

Explore other reviews about APPRISE

5.0
Nov 29, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get to learn a lot and apply your skills to helping energy policy programs for low income households. There are talented individuals working here. I was able to work 40 hours a week of actual work and get my work done. Management does really care about the quality of the work as the results have an impacts on low income households and they have high standards. They give you a lot of feedback and great access to training and help with improving yourself. There is room to grow if you are motivated.

Cons

Some don’t like that it's located at least a 10 minute walk from the train station.

2.0
Nov 15, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The external training opportunities, PTO, and health benefits are good, considering the company's size. Excluding management, colleagues are very friendly with one another and form a supportive network that offsets some difficult aspects of the work environment.

Cons

APPRISE has a problem retaining talent for more than about 2 years. During my 9 months at the company of roughly 25 people, 5 people left, many citing the difficulty and personal stress of working with upper management. As a result of this high turnover, there is often a shortage of institutional knowledge for new hires to benefit from. I was trained by an employee who had started work the previous month, and despite their best efforts, I did not feel that I was set up for success. This incomplete training was compounded by the President’s hostile attitude toward my attempts to learn from her. APPRISE strongly believes that there is such thing as a stupid question, and whenever I asked something that was considered too basic or unsubstantive, I was reprimanded and my question was not always answered. When I asked the President, whom many employees directly report to, for assistance in learning a new skill or approaching a new task, she consistently refused to provide guidance. She discouraged me from approaching coworkers with questions and reprimanded my coworkers for spending time helping me, even when they were willing and able to assist. Feedback at APPRISE comes with a shortage of carrots and an abundance of sticks. New employees are expected to learn from their mistakes by fixating on them for extended periods of time, sometimes stopping all other work to write the President a long-form email explaining an error and how they will improve in the future. The intentions behind this exercise are good, but in practice, it feels more like an activity for students in detention than one for working adults to correct a misconception. The President raised her voice at me on multiple occasions and was notorious among employees for her short temper and tendency to send unprofessional, abrasive emails when her patience ran low. I could go on about the President’s harsh behavior, micromanagement, and favoritism, but other reviews cover this in sufficient detail. APPRISE is a workplace that works for a select few, and those with thick skin, resilience, and limited contact with the President can build the foundations of a fruitful career here. However, this was not my experience. I encourage prospective applicants to read all reviews carefully and consider whether this is a culture in which they can thrive. I wish I had thought more carefully about my decision to join this company.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All