Generous benefits, but zero support - Technical Support Engineer Array (NY) Employee Review

3.0
May 10, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fully remote. Generous benefits. Fun and intelligent colleagues. Exciting new products and features.

Cons

Lack of training and support in general. You are just left to figure it out. This would be workable if there was good documentation, but there isn't. As a result, months or even years into the job, you will suddenly find out about a bunch of quirky legacy stuff that apparently exists, and nobody ever told you about. So even after years on the job, you still don't feel like you really know what's going on, because you don't know what you don't know. Everyone, especially in engineering, is overworked, so you have to DM folks and beg for help on the side all the time. In the mean time, HR makes everyone waste a ton of time on woke stuff like XYZ history month, awareness about diversity, inclusion, mental health, etcetera, while important bug fixes pile up and take months to fix. Lots of legacy clients are predatory, preying on poor people with terrible credit and tricking them into spending $40/m on credit reports, just to make a buck.

Explore other reviews about Array (NY)

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Clear expectations at a very stable organization.

Cons

High expectations can lead to friction in some cases

1.0
Apr 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Got paid for interview and onboarding

Cons

I went through what felt like a “ghost job” type of process. I was given a two-day technical assessment that required very little sleep and included pulling an all-nighter. The assignment was highly realistic and closely resembled production-level work in both scope and expectations. A significant amount of time and effort was required before even having a clearly established or confirmed role. This also included a CCAT assessment as part of the screening process, along with employment verification, ~45 pages of documents, and several hours of video content. After that, I was asked to record two 5–10 minute videos based on those materials, with very minimal prompts and no clear grading criteria or expectations. I was then told I scored just slightly below “acceptable” and was terminated immediately. The entire process felt disorganized from start to finish. The technical assessment was missing key pieces, almost as if it was incomplete or still being tested. During onboarding, I was already being added to meetings and even assigned a task, despite not having fully completed the onboarding process. Part of the reasoning given for my termination was that I wasn’t proactive in pointing out that I had been added to meetings and should have been focusing on onboarding instead. This was especially confusing, as those meetings and tasks were initiated by the team themselves. Given the amount of upfront work required and how the process was structured, this raised serious concerns for me about whether the role was clearly defined or fully established, and whether the expectations for candidates were aligned with an actual longterm position. Advice to others: Be cautious about the time commitment required before the role is fully secured. The process may require substantial effort upfront without clear expectations or evaluation criteria.

9
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All