Pros
Benefits are fine, and they’ve retained a talented staff despite the terrible environment because they tend to high mission-focused people.
Cons
Too many to list. Senior leadership is an absolute mess. One owner became recently more present in the daily work, and her lack of social awareness and general poor communication skills leaves a messy wake that staff have to try to clean up (when she’s not throwing them under the bus for one reason or another to try to deflect from her own serious lack of competence). The culture is toxic, and doesn’t in any way reflect the org’s externally marketing of it. The only hope here is that the company that acquired CH is shades better than its current leadership. It wouldn’t take much.