employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Consortium for Energy Efficiency

Is this your company?

Good Place to Work - Project Manager Consortium for Energy Efficiency Employee Review

4.0
Nov 12, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good life-work balance and great management. Management cares about employees and supports growth and development. Laid-back atmosphere and friendly staff. Organization is poised to grow. Not very much turnover; people tend to stay in their positions for many years.

Cons

Work is not deadline-driven or project based, so it's hard to tell whether you are making an impact. Generally, people are over qualified for the work they do and are paid slightly less than market rate.

Explore other reviews about Consortium for Energy Efficiency

5.0
May 6, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work with program administrators to advance energy efficiency

Cons

deliberate process can make progress slow

1
1.0
Nov 28, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some genuinely supportive colleagues doing meaningful, mission-driven work. Clean energy subject matter is interesting, even if the culture doesn’t support it. Solid benefits and 4 weeks of vacation — likely intended to offset the low pay.

Cons

My experience at CEE was completely unacceptable. I raised serious workplace concerns — including inappropriate behavior and safety issues — and leadership, utterly dismissed them. Nothing changed: the same manager, same role, same tasks persisted, and I was repeatedly asked to “reveal witnesses” rather than see any investigation or resolution. I had no choice but to take PFML because the environment was unsafe, and the company would rather push employees out than uphold a basic pillar of safety. The culture is toxic. Complaints are minimized or ignored, power dynamics are abused, and employees are left unsupported and vulnerable. Leadership prioritizes optics over accountability and creates an environment where speaking up carries personal risk. Constant turnover and ongoing “reorganization” amplify the instability — the number of departures in a single year was impossible to ignore and spoke volumes about the internal climate. The public image of collaboration and clean energy leadership is a facade; internally, employee safety and professional dignity are not valued. If you value your well-being, do not work here.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All