employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Equus Workforce Solutions

Engaged Employer

Disorganized - Anonymous employee Equus Workforce Solutions Employee Review

2.0
Jan 28, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent Benefits, Many employees are passionate about the mission to help find jobs.

Cons

High Stress and many are left to manage on their own. There is poor communication from upper management.

Explore other reviews about Equus Workforce Solutions

5.0
Mar 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I love helping families in my community and this job allows me to do this everyday. My co-worker all have big hearts and want others to succeed and grow.

Cons

Staff turn over is high due to low wages. Expectations to gain employment is to have a B.A. yet pay is very little for the required education. They do not pay more based on your prior experience in the field. Orange County is the 2nd most expensive county in the united states to live and we make just a bit more than minimum wage employees that do not have educations or work experience.

2
1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The role provides valuable experience in workforce development, compliance, documentation, and customer service.

Cons

The biggest challenge was the culture and management environment. The office often felt cliquey, and it could be difficult for new hires to feel welcomed or included. Rather than embracing new ideas or different approaches, there was often a "this is how we've always done it" mentality. Ironically, some of the same employees who openly complained about the company, management, policies, and day-to-day operations were often the least receptive to change or process improvements. This created an environment where negativity became normalized but solutions were harder to implement. Training and quality expectations were another major frustration. Expectations changed frequently, but training and communication did not always keep pace. Employees could receive different guidance depending on who reviewed their work, making it difficult to know which standard was actually correct. It often felt like employees were expected to figure things out on their own while still being held accountable for mistakes. Turnover was extremely high during my time with the company. Coverage responsibilities were frequently redistributed among remaining staff, often without corresponding adjustments to workload expectations. This created an environment where employees were expected to continuously adapt to staffing shortages while maintaining the same performance standards.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All