Pros
Good health benefits, that is all.
Cons
When I first joined this company, it was vibrant, dynamic, and full of promise. The founders were deeply engaged in the day-to-day operations, and it was genuinely a place I looked forward to coming to every day. However, that all changed abruptly in February 2024. The company culture, once its greatest strength, began to erode at a rapid pace. The turning point came with the introduction of new leadership, marking the start of the company’s decline. Under this new leadership, several concerning decisions were made that ultimately undermined the company’s integrity. To make matters worse, a closer look at the background of the new leadership revealed some troubling information. The person now in charge had previously worked for a company that went bankrupt under their leadership, resulting in significant financial losses. Shortly after this, several former employees from that bankrupt company joined GoTu, many of them occupying roles for which they were woefully unqualified. The decision to open a Denver office was supposed to be exciting—at least, that’s what we thought at first. Sure, it became glaringly obvious that the new hires weren’t exactly hired for their brains but for their proximity to the higher-ups. Who needs competence when you’ve got connections, right? Predictably, the Denver office became a colossal failure. But don’t worry—leadership spun the situation beautifully, making excuses and handing out special privileges like candy. A clear divide soon emerged within the company. If you were part of the right crowd, you could do whatever you wanted—show up late, party on weeknights, come in high or drunk (yes, we all saw it)—and still get promoted. No questions asked. It’s almost as if integrity is overrated when you can just turn a blind eye and make problems disappear. If you weren’t part of this inner circle, you were essentially ignored or treated with disdain. Your ideas, input, and contributions were quickly dismissed, often due to personal biases rather than the quality of your work. Any attempt to bring fresh ideas to the table was disregarded, and new management showed no interest in understanding what made the company function successfully before their arrival. Sales leadership was no different. The sales managers were essentially just professional yes-men. You could practically see their spines erode with every nod of approval. When it became clear they lacked the necessary leadership skills, management was more concerned with sparing their feelings than holding them accountable. The result was a culture of micromanagement, where inept managers could hide their incompetence behind a veil of “team support” and corporate excuses. And don’t even get me started on accountability. It doesn’t exist here. The phrase "owning up to mistakes" clearly isn’t in anyone’s vocabulary. Instead, it’s a game of passing the blame, with a healthy side of dishonesty thrown in for good measure. Leadership doesn’t know what anyone actually does on a day-to-day basis and seems uninterested in finding out. But don’t worry—at least they’re really good at looking impressive to investors, because that’s what this whole circus is really about, right? Making sure the people who have no idea what’s going on can look good to the people who have even less idea. In the end, what was once a promising, innovative company is now a shell of its former self—led by individuals who lack the competence, integrity, and vision necessary to lead. The culture is unwelcoming, the leadership is ineffective, and the future looks bleak unless there is a drastic shift in direction.