Third class company - Senior Analyst Innodata Employee Review

1.0
Apr 5, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you can keep buttering higher management, go ahead, they will promote you 5 times in 6 months.

Cons

1. Mega hiring and firing. 2. Will leave in high and dry after your probation. 3. They hire people nd after completion of probation, they fire people so they don't have to make them permanent. 4. Higher up have no idea what is going on, they are making managers within the team who have no experience, make ur life miserable. 5. Horrible favourism via managers. 6. They show minimal experience in thir works. 7. Even u qualified there interview, for each projects, there will be 3 rounds of test with 90% scoring criteria. There will training in terms of showing pets. Projects will me 2 weeks to 6 weeks long, but only for 1 day poor performance, they will hand you over PIP plan. Performance depends on quality, time management, occupancy in client portal, number of clicks and blah blah. Even only one parameter is down for one project for one day, they will give you their patent mail "Your service is terminated due to unsatisfactory performance " So, pls don't join. U will not be able to sleep for one day. "

Explore other reviews about Innodata

5.0
Feb 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Cons

Days can get repetitive and dry

2.0
Apr 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some flexibility Work from home

Cons

One thing I really didn’t enjoy about the guidance: our client sets a bench mark of having 85% “utilization”. Basically stating that of the 40 hours worked, 85% of that must be in “production code”, so about 35ish hours a week. The rest of the time can be spent reviewing emails, guidelines, etc. The project manager basically had management tell people that they could be 2.5 hours in other codes, and about 37.5 should be in production. If this is a decision from a client, then great, but it seemed to me the project manager was just trying to get every little bit of production possible out of people. I’m under the impression that if employees are treated like people and given proper breaks, the quality of work will be way better. If you force them to sit for 7.5 hours or a 8 hour day in front of a screen, the quality will be worse. The client says it’s 85% utilization, so why are we telling our employees they need to be in production for 37.5 hours out of the day? It just seems dishonest. Data annotation work can be tough and some of the tasks are repetitive and can take a lot of concentration. Half of the admin, forgets what it’s like to work in the queues, and drive these numbers blindly. Meanwhile, half of their job consists of chatting on teams all day.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All