Terrible place to work - Anonymous employee Ispace Employee Review

1.0
Oct 2, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It is a small company with a relatively flat organization. So you can easily reach managers, but nonetheless nobody will react on your feedback. The team is great, young and very talented engineers.

Cons

It is just an awful place to work. Old and unsafe intallations. You can feel the lack of solvency of that company in every corner of their installations. Unrealistic projects with unrealistic deadline, Bad management not qualified for their positions or for taking the best decissions for the team and the company. Lot of people not motivated and frustrated, Lack of trust in the team from management which creates a terrible company culture.

Explore other reviews about Ispace

5.0
Oct 14, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

healthy environment, flexible hours, project ownership, good mentors, friendly employees

Cons

slightly disorganized, confusing documentation methods

1.0
Mar 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They pay you competitively and have good benefits.

Cons

Leadership has zero clue what they're doing. No one in engineering or engineering leadership has ever built and flown a spacecraft before. When they hire people who do have that experience at the technical lead level(never the manager level, because then they'd have the power to actually change things), leadership doesn't listen to any of the suggestions they have or even remotely attempt to make correct programmatic or engineering decisions. Huge "sunk cost fallacy" rules programmatics here. Technical leads are never given any sort of design authority - everything is decided upon by managers who do not have the requisite technical background to be making those decisions. They regularly do "reorgs" and change people's job titles without talking to them. This is unacceptable and cowardly. Bad decisions never fall on leadership's heads - there is never any accountability. Instead, critical engineering staff are laid off and their roles/responsibilities are distributed to whoever is left, causing further attrition. Never any accountability at the managerial or executive level for making poor decisions that have run their single program into the ground.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All