Small Company, Project based, toxic environment - Devops Engineer MORO TECH Employee Review

1.0
Sep 5, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility of remote work, which allows to maintain a great work-life balance. High-quality equipment, laptops and the tools needed.

Cons

There is a lack of competence within the strategy team and the C-level manager, leading to poor decision-making. As a project-based company, this has resulted in lost projects and employees being left without work for extended periods. C level manager cares only about her beauty (she books working hours for that reason). Whoever is not pleasant to her is proposed to take psychological counselling.

avatar
MORO TECH Response
1y
Thank you for your feedback. We take your concerns about our leadership and strategy team seriously, as they are crucial to our success. We are confident that our leaders have high standards of professionalism, with a clear focus on driving the company's goals forward. However, we are dedicated to fostering a leadership approach that enhances both team morale and productivity even more, through continued investment in training and industry expertise. In addition, please note that we're focused on diversifying the scope of our projects and creating more opportunities that inspire innovation and fully utilize our teams' expertise. Your input is valuable to us, and we remain committed to making improvements for a better work experience. In case you would like to discuss this further, please reach out to us directly at people@moro.technology. The MORO TECH Team

Explore other reviews about MORO TECH

1.0
Feb 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work opportunities and competitive salaries.

Cons

Middle management positions have been given to individuals who behave poorly and disrespectfully toward their subordinates, and HR not only fails to address the issue but actively supports them. The work style feels robotic rather than human, and there is a complete lack of empathy or emotional connection between teams. The work itself is boring, and Agile is being implemented incorrectly by unskilled delivery managers who lack the necessary knowledge to manage engineering teams.

1
1.0
Aug 20, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Full remote setup - Engineers were great colleagues with strong personalities and good intentions. Most of the individuals at team level were genuinely supportive - Occasional opportunities to interact with stakeholders at a high level (Unfortunately, these positives were completely overshadowed by poor leadership and lack of structure)

Cons

- Management ignored established processes, creating confusion about roles, responsibilities, and priorities. Tasks were often shuffled arbitrarily, undermining structure and accountability. - Feedback culture was weak. Criticism was delivered without examples, promised follow-ups never occurred, and transparency was lacking. - Accusations of poor time management were made despite workload far beyond reasonable expectations. - Blame was routinely shifted onto others, including misassigned responsibility for past issues. Client challenges sometimes required defending technical work, yet similar support from leads or management was not extended to others. - Mixed messages, contradictions, and lack of strategy and vision made decision-making difficult. Key meetings were often inaccessible, and guidance from management was inconsistent or absent. - While engineers were collaborative and open, honesty and transparency were lacking at the level of leads and directors. Politics and personal agendas dominated, making open discussion risky and undermining genuine collaboration.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All