Prestigious Program, Great Benefits, and Broad Exposure to Legal Field - Project Analyst Mintz Employee Review

4.0
Jan 10, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-->Very high level of responsibility relative to comparable legal positions. -->Unparelleled exposure to a diverse range of law. Depending on office, this can be cleantech, corporate, litigation, consulting (ML Strategies), real estate, public finance, pro bono, immigration. -->Self-Managed program- Ability to spearhead community service projects, handle budgetary finances of program, carry out recruiting of program after HR training --> Positions available in great cities (Boston, NYC, or DC) all with their unique experience --> Personal mentors --> Above average pay relative to other entry-level legal positions. --> Great benefits (especially vacation and holiday package) --> Supervisors and firm very respectful of life outside of work (LSAT, GMAT, Grad School Apps, etc) --> Top-of-the-line colleagues (PA's are often highly accomplished, recent college grads with great credentials that go on to do amazing things both in and outside of the legal profession)

Cons

-->The Project Analyst program (PA) is unique in that there are few, if not zero, positions like it at law firms. Therefore, lawyers at firms might not know/understand our role at first. -->Uneven work flow --> No room for advancement

Explore other reviews about Mintz

5.0
Mar 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People, ability to work across practice groups, commitment to DEI and pro bono

Cons

Difficult to bring in smaller clients

1.0
Mar 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It is Cravath Salary Scale

Cons

it has the highest turnover in Boston Big Law for a reason: Higher billable requirements than almost any other firm in Boston; Horrible reputation (both culture and with clients) on the corporate side; Abusive reputation; Very long partnership track (12 years); Unlikely to hit billable hour requirements unless on the M&A team; Very low client retention, especially on the ecvc side; no centralized staffing; Poor support with very few paralegals (and very high paralegal turnover); Losing steam over the last few years.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All