Reports of a positive new culture are greatly exaggerated - Anonymous employee PNAS Employee Review

1.0
May 5, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- The retirement plan is a solid one. The healthcare package is decent too. - Flexible work arrangements, for some staff in some departments. ~100% remote work is available to many staff, though it's not made clear what determines eligibility. - If you do work in-office, the location is right off the National Mall and the building is cool. Not terribly easy to get to, and not much in the way of food options, but the scenery is lovely. - Relatively low-pressure. Upwards mobility has a low ceiling and after a certain point there's no incentive to shine relative to your peers. As long as you're doing your job there's no need to worry too much about what your supervisor thinks. Pay raises are small and have more to do with your supervisor's outlook as your performance. - A good deal of racial and gender diversity in all levels of staff. - If you join an entry-level position, you'll find a good degree of camaraderie among that group.

Cons

- Management that can be described variably as cruel, condescending, indifferent, ineffectual, incompetent, and ill-suited for the job. Managers will mock employees who request raises. -- Decisions affecting day-to-day workflows are made by people who are unfamiliar with those processes; this includes responses to concerns about workloads. -- Journal policy changes are implemented on a whim and technical improvements to make those new workflows possible are promised eventually. -- If someone you're working with is unhappy about anything, you can expect to be blamed for it. Your immediate supervisor may or may not have your back, but there's a culture of disregard for entry-level workers that inevitably wins out. -- Management does not take criticism kindly. Deciding whether to speak out about something may impact your pay. The DEI committee, which was created at the urging of the staff, has been told not to focus on concerns involving management. - Low pay, low raises. Annual merit pay increases in the 3% range. They don't allow anyone to negotiate their salary, which is well-intended but results in uniformly low pay instead of uneven pay. Entry-level positions get can promoted twice and then your pay will stagnate. - Quasi-affiliation with The National Academies organization makes employment logistics difficult. The people you will work with in HR and IT are not people you will work with often. Academies leadership handled the transition back to "hybrid" work very poorly.

Explore other reviews about PNAS

5.0
Apr 13, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are many people at PNAS who appreciate constructive feedback on both personal and professional levels, and they sincerely want to make a positive difference. As others have stated, yes, at one point, the journal suffered from internal problems, mostly due to poor management and a lack of communication. However, when such problems were acknowledged and officially brought up to those with the power to affect change, necessary changes were implemented and situations improved significantly. Initially, there were issues related to professionalism, respect, and the sheer amount of work that employees received. However, workloads have since become manageable, and employees are no longer "talked down" to, but rather are included in department conversations. PNAS, which has always been a well-respected journal, has also become a great place to work -- but you need to be proactive if you run into issues. The journal has also made major strides in acknowledging diversity issues, both in terms of its content and work culture (it even has its own diversity, equity, and inclusion committee, which is very active as well).

Cons

See "pros" section for more information.

4.0
May 1, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I worked at PNAS for a little over two years and gained a lot of positive experiences and learned a ton of useful skills. Beyond the day to day duties of my position, I enjoyed learning about the academic publishing industry and science, in general. I really felt like the work that I was doing had purpose. Management encouraged you to grow by allowing you to try new things and pushed training opportunities. Constantly learning is something that's always going to stick with me. Lastly, I would like to mention that I worked at PNAS during the pandemic, and I believe that management handled it appropriately by always encouraging staff to take off if they felt burnt out or if they needed a mental health day.

Cons

Since PNAS was my first "real" job, I didn't have any other experiences for comparison; however, I would say that the workload was intense and the salary was low compared to the amount of work/responsibilities given, which may not be a PNAS-specific issue but more so a non-profit issue from what I've heard from other folks that work at non-profits.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All