Pros
Interesting and important work across a wide range of topics/industries, including corporate and government. Most projects address major strategic questions that are top priorities for CEOs, boards, or government bodies Teams are small (typically 2-4 people), meaning significant exposure to partners and senior clients, and usually insight into the whole project rather than just a small section (as is typical at larger firms) Genuinely interesting and interested colleagues, and a strong focus on firm culture. No quotas for promotions like some companies… you’re only measured against your own development, and supported where needed. Non-traditional backgrounds (e.g. PhD, medicine, engineering) are common at all levels Every effort made to accommodate project preferences (e.g. wanting to work overseas, or needing to avoid long-term travel projects) Relatively flat hierarchy and lack of bureaucracy mean there are real opportunities to personally make an impact
Cons
Working on critical problems for clients can sometimes demand more than standard 9-5 hours and/or work intensity Small teams (and boutique firm) mean that there can be some extra ‘legwork’ required (e.g. research, formatting charts). However, you will become an Excel/PowerPoint ninja