Pros
The technical problems are genuinely interesting and some of the people are sharp — That part I won't take away from them'
Cons
What got to me wasn't the difficulty of the work, it was the organizational layer around it — decisions take longer than they should, and by the time something gets resolved the context has already shifted, which is not a great loop to be in repeatedly. There's also a gap between how leadership describes the direction and what teams are actually being asked to focus on day to day, and that gap doesn't get addressed directly, it just kind of sits there and everyone quietly works around it, and after a while that becomes the norm and nobody questions it anymore, which.... honestly doesn't make sense to me as a way to run thins. The two stars isn't because the work isn't real — It's because the environment makes it harder than it needs to be to actually do that work well.