employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Ria Money Transfer

Part of Euronet

Engaged Employer

Pro's Need Not Apply - Software Developer Ria Money Transfer Employee Review

1.0
Jun 4, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Sometimes there are pizza parties?

Cons

Nepotism. Rampant nepotism, which is caused by, and leads to very poor, incompetent management. The bar at this operation is about as low as it gets: talent, pay, working conditions; it's all just far below what you'd get out of other "financial" companies like Schwab, Western Union, Raymond James, E-Trade, etc.. You'll be working with mostly junior people (nothing against them), and lots of them. Since everything is so dumbed down and repetitive, they really don't look for talent and therefore don't really need to pay for it, so they make up that gap in sheer numbers (yes, it works as well as you think it would). You'll be shamed for wanting to do things the right way, or for trying to raise the bar in what you create and how you go about creating it. If someone approaches you about working for this organization, politely ask some tough questions about turnover (especially turnover), ways of working, pay and how promotions work. Don't worry, you won't scare them away, they're likely desperate, as the place is a perpetual revolving door, but you owe it to yourself to level set on expectations before you find yourself itching to leave after 6 months. You've been warned.

Explore other reviews about Ria Money Transfer

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to learn customer service! Great atmosphere Consistent schedule

Cons

Stress when cashing checks Working alone the majority of the time

1.0
Feb 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some people are great to work with

Cons

Compensation is significantly below market for product roles in fintech. You are expected to operate at a high strategic level while being paid closer to mid-tier startup salaries. Equity is used as a selling point, but stock performance has been consistently weak, making that upside questionable. Frequent restructuring makes long-term roadmap planning almost impossible. Entire teams can disappear after a quarter of strong performance if cost targets are not met. Senior talent is often removed under “cost alignment” language and replaced with lower-cost labor in other regions. Promotion criteria are vague. Results alone are not sufficient. Executive proximity and political alignment carry disproportionate weight.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All