Amazing company for Freshers looking for Technical Growth! - Security Analyst Safe Security Employee Review

4.0
Dec 18, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The ECS (Security Team) Team has some exceptionally passionate people who can help you grow both your technical and interpersonal skills. Approachable colleagues irrespective of the designations.

Cons

The HRs are a joke. Please don't expect any sort of professionalism from them. Most of the team are a bunch of newbies who have literally no experience in people skills. In the off chance that you find them close and friendly to you, it is only to obtain inside news of the team and then share with the management and further use that information to manipulate others. The senior technical people in the organization spend majority of their time in management with real technical work done only for like 3-5% of their entire responsibilities. Although this is the case in every organization for senior folks please do note that these people whom I am talking about are only 2 years experienced and dying to do technical over management. One advice to the current employees of Lucideus is to please not believe a word that is mentioned in the "ConFab" sessions blindly. In reality only 10% of the information conveyed in these sessions are actually true. ConFab is a name given to the hour that the CEO uses to con his employees.

Explore other reviews about Safe Security

5.0
Apr 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Genuinely category-defining work in cyber risk - from CRQ, TPRM to CTEM — not marketing fluff, real outcomes for CISOs. Fast-paced, intellectually stimulating environment where good ideas win regardless of who they come from. Leadership is accessible, decisive, and transparent about where the company is headed and why.

Cons

Moving fast means priorities can shift; comfort with ambiguity is a real requirement, not a cliché. The bar is high and the pace is relentless; not the right fit for someone looking to coast.

6
1.0
May 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some individual engineers/other employees were genuinely helpful and kind.

Cons

The company somehow has both heavy processes and constant urgency, which produces chaos instead of structure. Leadership frequently calls the organization a “family” and claims to be transparent, but communication is selective and decisions happen behind closed doors. Engineering culture is defined by constant overwork and subtle pressure to offload tasks onto others just to stay afloat. You spend as much time defending your workload and deadlines as you do actually building anything. The CEO’s mindset feels stuck in 2015—there are frequent “Ferrari” metaphors, “work harder” rhetoric, and at one point, even a story shared in a surprisingly celebratory tone about a former employee who worked himself into a heart attack. This fits a broader pattern: a strong emphasis on minimizing short-term costs rather than making decisions with long-term stability or scalability in mind, which raises questions about the company’s longer-term direction. A significant number of US engineers had already been quitting because the workload and expectations were identical across regions while the compensation didn’t come close to matching US cost of living; unlike in India, labor protections and broader opportunities made leaving a more realistic option. The US engineering layoffs were ultimately explained as a reaction to several managers quitting, yet they came directly on the heels of this wave of voluntary departures. This also matters when reading reviews, since employee experiences and incentives can differ significantly by region.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All