Don't work here if you care about your -and your family's- wellbeing! - Clinical Project Manager Science 37 Employee Review

1.0
Nov 11, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The name. It still reminds people the original mission of the company.

Cons

The current CEO is single handedly sinking this company to the ground. Hensurrounded himself with "yes men/women" and operates like a "king wannabe". They operate on a hire to fire model. They'll get you in with a somewhat competitive pay and the mission, which is just left over from the glory days of the company; then they'll work you to death with impossible tasks until you break (and you will!). Then you'll either quit or get fired and will be replaced by the next idealistic clinical research professional. They do NOTHING for the well-being of the employees. If they say that they do, it's only on the paper. Science 37 was in a bad shape before IPO, and now with the almost worthless price of the stock, they're in chaos mode! Sales team says yes to everything fully knowing that clinical operations will not be able to deliver! They don't care! They need new business on the balance sheet and failure to deliver will be dealt with later. This used to be an awesome tech company with a mission in clinical research. The CEO effectively turned it into a CRO that only cares about money and nothing else. Not the employees or the patients!!!

Explore other reviews about Science 37

5.0
Apr 7, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good management, support. Great pay

Cons

Sometimes not a lot of visits depending on time of year

1.0
Oct 17, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The job offered decent pay and benefits, but unfortunately, that's where the positives end.

Cons

Cons: Poor Work-Life Balance: The workload was often overwhelming with no respect for personal time, leading to significant stress and burnout. Toxic Culture: The workplace environment was highly dysfunctional, with ineffective communication and widespread favoritism. Accountability was lacking, and conflict was often ignored or mishandled. The result was a lack of trust and transparency across teams, creating unnecessary tension and stress among employees. Lack of Leadership: Leadership is a major issue here. Managers were more concerned with covering themselves than supporting their teams. There was no clear direction, and decisions felt arbitrary at times. Worse, there was no room for upward mobility or career growth, no matter how well you performed. Inadequate Compensation: The company fell short on promised bonuses. My first-year bonus was a mere 1/4 of what was expected, and by the second year, no bonus was given at all, with little explanation. Unfair Travel Policies: The daily food stipend was unrealistically low—$80, no matter where you traveled (whether to a high-cost city or an airport). Expenses beyond that were rejected, forcing employees to pay out of pocket. This policy made travel unnecessarily stressful.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All