Pros
Got few nice team mates
Cons
The VP of this organization doesn't have any kind of professionalism and work ethics. It is disappointing to witness the lack of competence and leadership displayed in his role. The project under his supervision was poorly planned, with a codebase so substandard that it was destined to fail. His indifference to code quality and failure to hold his team accountable for their work clearly demonstrate his inability to oversee a meaningful and sustainable project. His understanding of project management and technology is severely lacking. The only way to sustain under his leadership is to constantly portray and showcase your work and if you are good in fooling the stakeholder and lying you will consider as a smart , as he is only not technically sound , so he wont consider your technical expertise , you are a good employee only when you are good in manipulating and fooling . If you’re not good at presenting your contributions, he won’t recognize your efforts, making it difficult to receive appraisals or appreciation. This highlights how blind he is in terms of understanding technology and the actual work being done. His lack of familiarity with modern technologies and refusal to stay updated only worsens the situation. By treating every employee, senior and junior, as though they possess the same level of experience and skill, and making baseless comparisons, he demonstrates unprofessional behavior. As he lacks knowledge of the technology, he assumes all employees are the same regardless of their experience. This failure to recognize and nurture talent has led to a chaotic and demotivated team environment. Adding to the chaos, the way he assigns tasks is laughable. Just before catching a flight, he spares 10-20 minutes to skim through tasks. Without analyzing the depth or complexity of the work, he assigns tickets and even provides estimations based solely on the headings. This only highlights how poorly suited he is for the role of a self-proclaimed "Technical Head." Moreover, his blatant favoritism has created a toxic workplace and fights within the team. Granting special privileges like hybrid work, work-from-home options, and excessive appreciation to a select few, while denying the same to others, is unprofessional and discriminatory. His work ethics shift conveniently depending on the person—while he denies even a single day of WFH for normal employees, citing difficulty in tracking their 9-hour workday, his favorite employees have been enjoying WFH for ages without issue. The irony is that this doesn’t seem to bother him, likely because he himself is working from home. Even when employees raised concerns about this bias, he responded with empty promises, further proving his lack of integrity and fairness. His management style has not only hampered project success but also destroyed team morale. It’s unfortunate that instead of fostering a productive and inclusive environment, he has turned the workplace into a breeding ground for favoritism, hypocrisy, and mediocrity.