50/50 : Softing Singapore - Unspecified Softing Employee Review

2.0
Apr 16, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice co-workers New comers to the company with reasonable experience will get a senior position. Work life balance is good Business is getting better Very little politics

Cons

Not a good place to start your career if you are a fresher trust is very very hard to build and you may not be placed on your area of interest. If you are an experienced guy, you can get a senior position. But being promoted within is another story. No process for training nor career improvement. No 1 on 1 performance evaluation every year, the metrics of the salary increment every year is unknown. Very poor communication between the management and the employee on this part. Salary increment around 1% to 4% every year. Everything evolves on one product line. There are no annual career plans. Management is too focused on making money. Good employees have left and some employees in the company are also planning to go somewhere better.

Explore other reviews about Softing

5.0
Dec 28, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay and competitive landscape

Cons

Too many hats expected by everyone that works there

3.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company offered good employee benefits. The medical insurance coverage was strong, including dental coverage and family coverage, although there were concerns that some benefits might be reduced in the future. Annual leave entitlement was also reasonable at 18 days. The company also had capable and hardworking employees, especially in the engineering team. Many team members had strong product knowledge, supported customers responsibly, and tried their best to keep the product running despite limited resources.

Cons

In my opinion, the main issue was weak local leadership and poor product direction. For a small office with mainly one key product, the company needed a capable leader who understood the product, the market, the customers, and the technical challenges. The leader should be able to work with the team to drive the product forward, improve sales direction, and identify where the product still has market value. However, from my experience, local leadership did not appear to have enough domain or technical understanding to support the product effectively. There was no clear strategy to strengthen the product, improve market positioning, or rebuild sales momentum. Instead, the workplace became more political and less performance-driven. During the restructuring period, employees did not feel strongly represented or protected by local management. Many decisions appeared to be executed from the top down, with little visible effort to challenge, explain, or propose better alternatives for the local team. This created frustration and disappointment, especially among employees who had contributed to the product for many years. There also seemed to be favoritism in how people were treated. In my view, capability, product knowledge, and real contribution were not always the main factors in how employees were valued. This affected morale and trust within the team. For a small company, leadership quality is critical. When the local leader does not deeply understand the product, the customers, or the technical side of the business, it becomes very difficult for the team to succeed. The issue was not only business downturn, but also lack of strong leadership, lack of transparency, weak employee support, and a culture that became too political.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All