Pros
Genuinely smart, passionate people across all regions. Global exposure and autonomy: worked across five countries, collaborating directly with university execs and project teams. Fast-growing company with exciting potential in higher-ed transformation. Ability to shape your own role and influence strategy (if you can handle the chaos). Strong focus on client success and outcomes; rewarding to see tangible results in universities. Flat structure makes it easy to voice ideas and get visibility with leadership.
Cons
Growth outpaced structure — teams often stretched thin with unrealistic timelines and workloads. Product maturity and internal alignment didn’t always keep up with market ambitions. Rapid expansion led to shifting priorities and disconnect between regions. Leadership communication inconsistent; decisions sometimes felt kneejerk or contradictory. Limited resources for professional development compared to company size and ambition. Work-life balance is grueling.