A sense of achievement and success emanates from every aspect of Verisk Analytics! - Publication Support Analyst Verisk Employee Review

4.0
Dec 8, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Verisk is the logical progression of ISO (Insurance Services Office), the company from whence it has arisen. ISO has the distinction of being the "hub" of the Property/Casualty insurance industry and is known as the authority for risk management and elevated analytics. Verisk hires the best and offers employees an opportunity to achieve their ultimate personal best, through educational programs and the opportunity to work with like-minded colleagues. Coming from a diverse background, myself, I can attest to the opportunities available to achieve recognition and become inspired to excel.

Cons

There is a tendency to maintain a departmental status quo. Innovations have often been resisted by employees who have worked within ISO for years. There is little recognition and sense of being part of Verisk Analytics. Most employees don't recognize that something wonderful has been created in their midst.

avatar
Verisk Response
11y
Thanks for your thoughtful feedback. The changes we've made since your comments, and those that we continue to make, are very aligned with the advice you provided.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
Jul 1, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Cons

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All