Growth oriented company. - Anonymous employee onsemi Employee Review

4.0
Aug 25, 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They are willing to invest in employee education. They are growing by acquisition. Atmosphere is somewhat informal and flexible. Finance department has done a terrific job of managing post-Motorola spin-off debt burden. Sales Leadership has typically been very positive with a 'can-do' attitude. They are a strong player in the discrete markets.

Cons

Rating and ranking system of 360 degree reviews can be very political. Somewhat regular waves of layoffs and frequent re-organizations-very demoralizing. Not uncommon for frequent job (lateral) changes do to frequent re-orgs. This can make it difficult to see strategic work through to completion (we all want to feel we accomplished something). SVP of HR manages upward and is rarely seen meeting with employees below leadership level positions (C-level, VPs and directors).

Explore other reviews about onsemi

5.0
Mar 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company is focused on meaningful, long‑term impact, and you truly feel that the work you do matters—especially given onsemi’s role in power, automotive, and industrial technologies.

Cons

Like many large global companies, alignment across regions and functions can take time.

1.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company offers good pay and benefits. I also had the chance to work with many capable and supportive peers at the same level, which made the day-to-day work more manageable.

Cons

The work environment can feel highly political. The system tends to encourage people to compete or protect themselves instead of collaborating and helping each other succeed. This often creates unnecessary tension between teams and individuals. Local management also needs significant improvement. Instead of helping remove roadblocks and making the work more efficient, they often add extra processes, tasks, and requirements that do not always contribute to the real goal: improving quality and getting meaningful work done. There is a lot of focus on activities that look good on paper, but not enough support for the actual work needed to ensure quality and execution.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All