Editors make this job unbearable - Writer studioD Employee Review

2.0
Nov 21, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Once your article finally gets submitted, you do get paid within two days. You write about what you know, which is usually something that interests you. There are usually many topics to choose from. I can usually write an article in less than two hours, coming up to roughly $12.50 and hour, which isn't too shabby for an underemployed recent grad. Work from home on your own time.

Cons

The editors are the worst. There are who knows how many and they all have their own idea of what is right, despite there being general guidelines which everyone is supposed to adhere to. Most editors suggest edits that don't make sense and are grammatically incorrect. The pay isn't the best especially once editors are giving you ridiculous rewrites and telling you to leave out vital information because they don't understand it (which is obvious, the WRITER does the research, not the editors) and your $12.50/hour suddenly becomes much less. You can't be creative with your words so all the articles come out sounding robotic and boring. If you are able to just drone on and don't mind just writing for content and not for engaging, informational, factually correct, interesting writing, then I guess you'll love it.

Explore other reviews about studioD

5.0
Mar 18, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very good management. No micromanaging

Cons

Sometimes the shifts you get aren’t the best but you’ll get that working anywhere

2.0
Nov 7, 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Work from home That's about it. When articles are plentiful, it's a good source of income. But articles haven't been plentiful for years.

Cons

-Article availability: Demand broke every category into separate sections they require writers to apply to individually. This greatly decreased the amount of available work. Furthermore, they've lost many of their partners and clients, leaving very few (none for months, at times) articles, most of which are rewriting old and outdated/inaccurate eHow titles. -They Expect Too Much, then ignore qualifications they require: Most sections require a degree or years of experience in a related field. IE- Some kind of tech degree for the tech section. Yet even though you must be a qualified expert to write for a section, they still require a reference for literally every statement, fact, process or instruction. What's the point of the experience or degree if every statement is treated, by default, like the writer doesn't know what they're talking about? -Low pay for the amount of work involved: $25 an article may seem like a good rate, but between doing the required amount of research, finding and claiming titles that actually make sense, adhering to their strict, ever-changing guidelines and the Russian Roulette of an editing process (one editor may approve where another would ask for a full rewrite), it typically takes well over an hour to claim, research and write an article. May be good pay compared to other content mills and work for novice writers, but anyone with DMS-level qualifications and experience could probably do a lot better than DMS.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All