Project HOME reviews

My experience at Project HOME was overwhelmingly negative. Leadership and management created an environment that I found adversarial, uncomfortable, and lacking in support. My direct manager was confrontational, unappreciative, and provided little guidance despite assigning significant responsibilities. Toward the end of my employment, I was placed in a high-pressure renovation project with only a few weeks’ notice and extremely high stakes. Responsibility was placed on me without the planning, resources, or support necessary to succeed. When problems arose, leadership appeared more interested in assigning blame than sharing accountability. Regular check-in meetings with my manager and the director often felt more like interrogations than collaborative discussions. Questions would be asked over Zoom, followed by prolonged periods of silence, creating an atmosphere that was intimidating and unnecessarily uncomfortable. Rather than receiving coaching or support, I frequently felt scrutinized. I also observed significant dysfunction and poor coordination between departments. Critical responsibilities that should have been handled by tenant services and support staff were often neglected or poorly executed, creating unnecessary risks and placing vulnerable residents in situations that should never have occurred. The lack of communication, accountability, and follow-through was deeply troubling. Despite completing a substantial amount of work during my tenure, there was little appreciation or recognition. I found the organization to be more focused on bureaucracy, optics, and internal messaging than on execution, employee development, and actually solving problems. The public image and mission promoted externally did not align with the culture I experienced internally. I would strongly encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the management culture and organizational effectiveness before accepting a position.