Root Cause reviews

3.8

79% would recommend to a friend

(26 total reviews)

Andrew Wolk

49% approve of CEO

59% positive business outlook

Root Cause has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 26 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Root Cause employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

26 reviews
2.0
Feb 8, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I learned a lot about project management, managing up, internal operations/team management, consulting services, scope writing, and the social sector in Boston. I now have many skills that positioned me competitively when I was looking for new opportunities. I had a fabulous manager who truly cared about my personal growth (who has since left) and amazing peers who were able to critically think about the social sector, issues of equity and privilege, etc. Unfortunately, many of these peers have since left and I cannot vouch for many pros at the current organization. Lastly, since Root Cause is a fairly smaller organization, I got to interact with all levels of the staff and learn about things outside of my role.

Cons

If you are considering working here I strongly encourage you to prepare STRONG interview questions and do your homework/research on what has happened with the organization. Highlights you should know about below: Organization went through significant change starting last fall, which stemmed from a decision the CEO made alone and that reflected he does not truly understand the organization he is running, or that he is managing people's lives by being the leader of an organization. Many of the bright, talented, determined staff have since left. The organization is not sure what its mission is, and is tempted to "blow with the winds" and follow the latest "trend" in the social sector, e.g. pursuing a focus on empowering organizations with data and evidence. While an occasional mission clarification is healthy for an organization, working somewhere that does not have a strong value proposition and changes at a whim is nerve-wracking. Select senior staff (namely the ones who have been there since the beginning and know they are not in danger of ramifications) do not know how to manage well and are not interested in learning. Feedback from junior staff on how difficult it is to work with these senior members of the team fall on deaf ears. It is not encouraging/supportive (frankly, it is sometimes embarrassing) to work for people who do not care about your development, from whom you cannot learn, and who are not willing to think critically about the sector and your work with you. HR, promotions, salary, and professional development are not strong. Even if you think you don't care as much about those aspects of an organization as the actual work and content you'll be involved in (as young professionals can sometimes think), please consider carefully. Without a supportive team you can trust, a healthy feedback loop, and being valued and given credit for your work, you will not enjoy going to work every day.

2.0
Feb 5, 2017

Hard Truths but What You Need To Know

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great opportunity to meet fellow "Junior" colleagues who are passionate, intelligent, and supportive. They have made working here extremely worthwhile. There is also the opportunity to work with really amazing clients who are doing important work on a range of social issues. The training received here is also really great. You learn skills quite quickly and in detail that are transferable to other careers you might pursue.

Cons

HR & Advancement- There is none, which has made any process for advancement, compensation, and conflict resolution extraordinarily ambiguous, convoluted, and disastrous. The process for advancement has just become some kind of institutionalized with little formalization and follow-through because there is not dedicated HR personnel. It has been an area that has been severely underinvested in and has contributed to high levels of frustration amongst staff, and especially junior staff. Salary- Most starting salaries here are low, especially for those in non-senior management positions. Almost insulting low given not only the level and type of work you are expected to perform, but also given the geographic location in which you are required to live. Most competitor organizations pay at a higher rate than RC does. Additionally, the only real way, you get any type of financial advancement here is by advocating and fighting on your own behalf, and I mean fight. Even if you have been working there in the same position, salary range for years, your work will be acknowledged but your salary will not reflect that acknowledgement unless you relentlessly fight for it and wade through the multitude of inexcusable refusals. This has led to many staff members feeling underpaid and overworked, further leading to resentment against the company for not financially recognizing staff contributions and work quality. Senior Management- The CEO has a bit of a Napoleon complex, where everything and everyone must be loyal to him and trust wholly in him regardless of whether or not he is deserving of that loyalty or praise or if any of his decisions make sense. I think this might be beginning to change as over the years staff members have been relentless at pushing him to change for the better of the organization. But his temper, speaking tone, interaction, and personality can be quite disruptive and stressful for anyone working here. There is also a COO, whose role is massively unclear in the broader decision making process but executes a number of the operational and infrastructure actions on behalf of the CEO. The COO also dually functions as some sort of HR person but does not perform the tasks of that job effectively, at all. How decisions are made remains unclear, as even those in the most senior of positions are not plugged in or are plugged in to late to important decisions. Feedback- The feedback loop and "system" (to the extent there is one) is very vertical and paternalistic, with little opportunity to give real feedback to your supervisors or senior management directly. This creates an environment in which the entire senior level team appears untouchable and unapproachable for change. Some senior staff just do not know how to manage, and because senior management does not either, it feels like there is little interest in improving in this area. Diversity/Inclusion- There really isn't any at the senior leadership level. Junior staff did a significant amount of work to bring these issues to the forefront with significant pushback in the beginning and over time some level of engagement, but it never really got embedded into the culture of the organization despite the "work" that is done. I felt bad for the junior staff that did so much (all of who were of color) to push this forward and wasn't fully invested in to be successful. The Work- It feels like the company goes through an identity crisis every year. The projects taken on often seem sporadic and misaligned with the overly idealistic mission of the organization. There is an aura of having more impact than the company can/or ever will have on anyone. Most attempts to put the company on a more realistic and meaningful path has been undervalued.

1.0
Feb 5, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Peers: I loved my peers at Root Cause - they were (all of left!) the most dedicated, committed, smart, passionate group of people. They were the only reason why I was able to stay at Root Cause for as long as I did. - Client: we did some great work with some great clients, especially in youth development and education and criminal justice. - Training: despite all the cons, you do get good training for consulting.

Cons

- Toxic work culture that mentally drains you. - Lack of functional leadership team that permeates every facet of the organization. - If you are a junior staff, you do all the work; the senior staff does no work. This makes the work-life balance totally off and you are constantly working, and that is the expectation.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 26 Reviews

Glassdoor has 30 Root Cause reviews submitted anonymously by Root Cause employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Root Cause is right for you.