The hiring process at Rounds takes an average of 17 days when considering 8 user submitted interviews across all job titles. To compare, the average duration of hiring at similar companies like BlackRock, Inc. is 14 days, Fabricated Software, Inc. is 2 days, and Apple Inc. is 21 days. Candidates applying for Data Analyst had the quickest hiring process (on average 7 days), whereas Android Developer roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 30 days).
I applied online. I interviewed at Rounds in May 2026
Interview
Applied for the Senior iOS position. The initial recruiter was unable to answer basic technical or scoping questions about the role and immediately pushed a mandatory 3-day take-home assignment.
I submitted a highly structured project featuring clean, protocol-based layering and thorough unit testing coverage written with TDD pattern. The feedback received felt heavily generated by an automated AI parsing tool rather than a comprehensive human code review, focusing entirely on sandbox-level edge-case optimizations rather than overall architecture and engineering discipline.
Advice to Management / HR:
Treat senior candidates' time with respect. If you require production-grade, multi-week optimization engines (like custom concurrent request deduplication and background downsampling) within a tight 3-day window, you should evaluate this via a live system design session rather than an asynchronous assignment.
Avoid if you value your time or at least do not agree on a home assignment!
Short call from group manager > Zoom with team leader - technical questions > SQL exam > Group manager Interview > HR > Proposal
There vibe didn't fit to my culture - It seems they have too many managers and less workers who do the actual job. so I decided not to continue
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at Rounds in Apr 2026
Interview
My interview experience with Rounds in April 2026 was one of the most poorly managed processes I have encountered. While the initial recruiter screening was standard, the subsequent stages revealed a significant lack of internal coordination and respect for the candidateâs effort.
After the screening, I was assigned a complex home project with a strict 48-hour deadline. The task required building a scraper for Google Play, periodically taking screenshot of GP page of apps, implementing a dashboard to show timeline, and hosting the final product on a cloud provider (AWS/GCP). The company explicitly demanded a production-ready solution, which required several hours of intensive work to meet their high bars for code quality and deployment.
The most insulting part of the process was the technical interview with two engineers. Despite the significant time investment required for the home assignment, the interviewers failed to mention it once. There was zero discussion regarding the architecture, code, or the live demonstration I was told to prepare. Instead, the session was pivoted to a generic system design prompt, designing Tinder, which bore no relevance to the specialized task I had just completed.
It is unacceptable to require candidates to perform free labor under the guise of a "production-ready" assignment only to ignore that work entirely during the evaluation. This process is disjointed, disrespectful of professional boundaries, and suggests a deep-seated inefficiency within their engineering culture. I would strongly advise others to value their time and reconsider engaging with this firm.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
The most frustrating part was that they didn't ask a single question about the complex, production-ready cloud solution I spent hours building. Instead, they completely ignored my work and spent the session asking me to design Tinder.