Get tailored insights about working at SAF in one quick step.
SAF interview questions
Updated Jan 26, 2019
based on 6 ratings
Difficulty
Easy
Experience
Very positive
How others got an interview
33%
In Person
In Person
33%
Applied online
Applied online
17%
Other
Other
17%
Employee Referral
Employee Referral
Interview search
6 interviews
Viewing 1 - 5 of 6 Interviews
SAF interviews FAQs
Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at SAF as 50% positive with a difficulty rating score of 2.75 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Assistant Engineer and Naval Officer rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Casher and AOSX roles were rated as the easiest.
The hiring process at SAF takes an average of 33 days when considering 5 user submitted interviews across all job titles. To compare, the average duration of hiring at similar companies like BlackRock, Inc. is 14 days, Fabricated Software, Inc. is 2 days, and Apple Inc. is 21 days. Candidates applying for Assistant Engineer had the quickest hiring process (on average 1 day), whereas Naval Officer roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 90 days).
I applied in-person. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at SAF (Singapore) in Jan 2016
Interview
they just talk to me and since i come from jc my boss decide to take me in so quite simple and fast. not bad liao, this job is quite popular so good that i got it as boss good
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at SAF (Falls Church, VA) in Dec 2014
Interview
Asked simple questions and the person interviewing made me feel comfortable. She was friendly, and caring. The interview was 1 one 1. After the interview I received a job offer.
I applied online. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at SAF (Perth, NY) in May 2011
Interview
very basic, interview, they asked similar questions to the ones online and were very friendly and courteous, great bunch. w e found the workplace to be very w welcoming.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .