Actuarial Analyst applicants have rated the interview process at Wawanesa Insurance with 2.5 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 100% positive. To compare, the company-average is 46.9% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Actuarial Analyst roles take an average of 30 days to get hired, when considering 2 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Wawanesa Insurance overall takes an average of 17 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Wawanesa Insurance as a Actuarial Analyst according to 2 Glassdoor interviews include:
One on one interview: 29%
IQ intelligence test: 14%
Group panel interview: 14%
Phone interview: 14%
Personality test: 14%
Presentation: 14%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. The process took 2 days. I interviewed at Wawanesa Insurance (Vancouver, BC) in Jan 2021
Interview
The interviewers are very nice and gentle. The interview was held on ASNA 2021.
However, they asked many technical questions (statistics) that I weren't prepared for.
The company looks at both personality and skills. Advice: Be approachable and friendly in the interview.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Describe a complex statistics concept to a person with no previous knowledge in statistics?
I applied online. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Wawanesa Insurance in Nov 2023
Interview
I was contacted by HR a month after my application about the status of my exam. I was then scheduled to meet the hiring manager and actuary for screening. If selected, you will then meet with the management team which asked some basic behavioral questions. Everyone was great and the process moved along fast.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How did you hear about Wawanesa?
Do you prefer P&C or Life/Health/Pension?
It was carried out via Zoom call. There were 2 rounds of interviews, with 2 interviewers each. The first round covered the resume and behavioral questions, while the second interview focused more on the technical questions.