ASSP reviews

2.3

20% would recommend to a friend

(28 total reviews)

Jennifer McNelly

8% approve of CEO

28% positive business outlook

ASSP has an employee rating of 2.3 out of 5 stars, based on 28 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The ASSP employee rating is 38% below average for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

28 reviews
1.0
May 22, 2025

Off mission

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Members are passionate and caring

Cons

What was once a great mission driven culture has been dismantled by new corporate-obsessed CEO. Over the past year and a half, the organization has undergone massive changes without clear explanation. Top leader constantly tinkering with the org chart, restructuring to mirror a large corporation—despite a headcount of only ~75—by adding new upper management layers focused on strategy, while lower-level staff are overworked and stretched thin. Those at the top collect bigger paychecks, widening the internal pay gap, while staff are set up to fail under the new regime. Many employees have been pushed out or have left due to burnout and nonstop upheaval. Dissenting voices are silenced, and anyone questioning the changes is labeled as resistant to progress. Employee survey surfaced major concerns, but unlike in the past, comments were not shared transparently. The member board appears unaware of the internal reality. Leadership behavior is erratic and self-promotional, with little regard for how staff are affected. The CFO has taken advantage of the instability, bringing in friends as consultants and bypassing fair hiring practices, with apparent financial benefit.

2.0
Apr 25, 2025

Staff discussion dismissed if not what they want to hear

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong Benefits Package: Competitive and comprehensive, contributing positively to work-life balance. Supportive Colleagues: Many dedicated and passionate team members who are great to work with. Meaningful Mission: Working in support of workplace safety gives purpose and pride in the work being done.

Cons

Lack of Open Dialogue: In recent years, there’s been a noticeable decline in the openness to certain staff ideas. Suggestions that differ from the prevailing view are often dismissed without discussion, making participation feel discouraged—even in meetings designed for collaboration. Disregard for Staff Feedback: Employee surveys and comments are not being utilized constructively, despite their intended purpose of improving organizational health. Return to Silos: After making progress toward collaborative teamwork, the organization has reverted to siloed decision-making. Subject-matter experts are often left out of relevant discussions. Devaluing Tenure: Long-term employees sometimes feel that their loyalty and institutional knowledge are no longer respected or valued. Lack of Inclusivity for Different Work Styles: Introverted team members or those with quieter approaches are often overlooked, rather than being recognized for their strengths and unique contributions. Overreliance on External Consultants: In situations where internal expertise exists, outside consultants are often brought in instead. This not only overlooks the knowledge and experience of current staff who have been close to the situation but can also bypass more thoughtful, inclusive internal processes.

2.0
Apr 18, 2025

Great Policies, Terrible Practice: Only Yes-Men Thrive Here

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great cause. Members are great people.

Cons

Since the new leadership took over, the culture has taken a hit. There’s a clear bias toward those who go along with whatever leadership says—disagreement isn’t welcome. People have been told to stay quiet in meetings, and those who speak up or challenge the status quo often find themselves sidelined or excluded. Hard-working employees aren’t recognized unless they’re part of the “in” crowd. Volunteer leadership roles also seem to go to those who play along, not necessarily the most capable or committed. Meanwhile, the teams that actually bring in money are constantly understaffed, while other departments—especially the ones close to leadership—keep growing. The company has solid policies on paper, but in practice, they’re applied selectively. It’s not about fairness—it’s about who’s in favor. If you're looking for a place that values honest input and rewards merit, this probably isn’t it right now.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 28 Reviews

Glassdoor has 31 ASSP reviews submitted anonymously by ASSP employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if ASSP is right for you.