employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Dimensional Innovations

Is this your company?

Complex feelings: 2 stars feels low, but 3 feels too optimistic - Associate Creative Director Dimensional Innovations Employee Review

2.0
Mar 18, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

DI can be a good place to launch a creative career, and you get to work with a lot of incredibly talented and hard working people. It’s easy to make connections and friends, and I always felt like it was a team effort to get projects to the finish line. Leaving was bittersweet, but culture shifts and low compensation outweighed staying.

Cons

The creativity and fun you can have at DI can been very rewarding, but that can be a double edged sword for creatives. The pressure to create never-been-done-before experiences requires a lot of energy that might not leave room for any of your own personal creative practices. Creatives are also expected to do several different types of work to fit each unique project’s needs through the design process, so be prepared to be flexible and for a big process learning curve. Pleasing clients is also a top priority to help ensure fabrication scope is won, so that can mean routinely turning work around for tight deadlines without overtime compensation for salaried positions. After 8 years of employment and a substantial promotion my pay increase was minimal. I felt taken for granted, and got nowhere even after attempting to negotiate. That paired with a culture shift to be more focused on growth and profit signaled it was time to move on. I think DI can be a decent place to work, but depending on your compensation and work/life goals it may not be a long term career option.

Explore other reviews about Dimensional Innovations

5.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented people, interesting projects, and a strong team environment.

Cons

Processes could be more streamlined.

3.0
Jan 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Exposure to a wide variety of projects and clients across industries (sports, museums, healthcare, corporate, etc.), which provided valuable learning about experiential design, fabrication, and integrated tech implementations. * Interactions with people from across the company were generally positive—many team members are motivated, collaborative, and genuinely trying to do good work. * The software/development team is extremely junior but enthusiastic and hardworking; there's real effort and potential in individuals. * Kansas City location is great—affordable living, good vibe, and the company contributes positively to the local creative/tech scene in some ways.

Cons

* The company is spread far too thin, dipping toes into too many areas (experience design, custom fabrication, signage, immersive tech, software, etc.) without committing fully or taking meaningful risks in any one direction. This leads to diluted focus and mediocre outcomes in competitive spaces. * In software and product development specifically, there's a fundamental misunderstanding of how brutally competitive the industry is. DI approaches it like a traditional client-service agency—when the client says jump, everyone jumps, with little room for strategic vision, iteration, or building repeatable, scalable products. It's custom work dressed up as innovation, but the reality is reactive agency behavior. * The software team, while eager, is very junior overall and lacks the depth/experience needed to compete in real software/product spaces. Leadership doesn't seem to grasp (or invest in) what it takes to build truly competitive tech. * There's an inflated sense of self-worth and positioning as a cutting-edge "tech firm" when the core strength is (and should remain) high-end custom fabrication, signage, and basic tech integrations for physical experiences. Trying to punch above their weight in pure software/product dev feels mismatched and unsustainable. * Project work often feels chaotic due to overextension—priorities shift based on whichever big client is loudest that quarter, not long-term strategy. * Pay is WAY BELOW market value for software development.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All