Senior Associate - Senior Associate Guidehouse Employee Review

1.0
Sep 7, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The only pro for working at Guidehouse was the pay was somewhat competitive, however, you can make a lot more money anywhere else, which is why almost all former PWC Public Sector employees have decided to move on to greener pastures with actual, reputable institutions. Hint Hint-Deloitte.

Cons

If I could give zero stars, I would. The management is a absolutely delusional and has zero desire to make any sort of effort to create better working environments or worthwhile work for their employees. Managers love to have a closed-door policy. They completely shut themselves off from their employees and create an environment in which their employees are not worth their time or effort. Especially for the cleared sites, they abuse the fact that HR is unable to see first-hand what is happening at client site, which makes it difficult for HR to enact any real change. Horrid management aside, if you desire having a job in which you feel personally fulfilled, motivated or a part of something that actually matters-STAY AWAY! The work is absolutely mundane. (Hope you love to Quality Check hundreds of documents!). Think you can approach management about doing real work ? Think that your manager cares that you already did all your work and are bored out of your mind? NOPE. They would rather you simply bill the client so that they get more revenue than actually have you be busy with work.

Explore other reviews about Guidehouse

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

fantastic company to work for

Cons

educational opportunities were hard to find and fund

3.0
Jun 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Smart, capable coworkers who genuinely care about delivering quality work. - Interesting public sector projects with meaningful client impact. - Opportunities to take on significant responsibility early in your career.

Cons

The Senior Consultant role feels significantly undercompensated for the level of responsibility expected. SCs are expected to own delivery, lead workstreams, write business development proposals, mentor junior staff, manage clients, and often keep engagements running - if not multiple if you are trying to promote which isn't guaranteed at all. However, the recognition and compensation don't reflect that level of ownership. Bonuses were eliminated, yet the workload remained the same (or increased). Leadership communicated that this would be offset by above industry standard raises and an additional salary increase, but the process lacked transparency. Even my people manager couldn't clearly explain what my raise would be or how it was determined. The utilization target of 91% for Senior Consultants is also extremely difficult to sustain while simultaneously contributing to internal initiatives, business development, and other non-billable expectations. Those competing priorities often result in long hours. With MC's, AD's, and D's asking saying this should only take you an hour or two - which isn't truthful at all. One of the most frustrating experiences was helping win contracts. While I'm proud of the team's accomplishments to get there, there was no financial recognition for the individuals who invested significant time into winning the work. It creates the feeling that Senior Consultants do much of the heavy lifting while higher levels receive most of the recognition and incentive compensation. They talk about a spot bonus of up to 10k, but no one believes it's real. Why would we trust at this point? The lack of transparency around compensation, career progression, and performance rewards is beginning to drive away talented people.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All