Not worth it in the long run - Manager Guidehouse Employee Review

1.0
Jul 9, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some people are great to work with and some of the account work can be very rewarding.

Cons

This place is not only toxic but also soul sucking . Leadership is terrible. Our CEO and COO are only present to make decisions that favor Partners vs the overall company. You can't change engagements or accounts easily at all. If you are on a team with bad leadership, you are in for a highly political road. People will lie to your face and throw you under the bus every chance they get. Hours over standard are required. HR is just unhelpful on a good day. Recruiting is constantly bringing in new people only to have them leave in a couple months. Training is non existent. Some of that might be fine if it wasn't for our IT systems being the most hindering part to your day. Email doesn't work, cloud doesn't work, emails can't send, emails from two weeks ago are being sent again, etc... Our IT system is literally a joke because it is so bad. Nobody understood what it would take to carve out a company. One year in, we are in a much worse place than where we started.

Explore other reviews about Guidehouse

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

fantastic company to work for

Cons

educational opportunities were hard to find and fund

3.0
Jun 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Smart, capable coworkers who genuinely care about delivering quality work. - Interesting public sector projects with meaningful client impact. - Opportunities to take on significant responsibility early in your career.

Cons

The Senior Consultant role feels significantly undercompensated for the level of responsibility expected. SCs are expected to own delivery, lead workstreams, write business development proposals, mentor junior staff, manage clients, and often keep engagements running - if not multiple if you are trying to promote which isn't guaranteed at all. However, the recognition and compensation don't reflect that level of ownership. Bonuses were eliminated, yet the workload remained the same (or increased). Leadership communicated that this would be offset by above industry standard raises and an additional salary increase, but the process lacked transparency. Even my people manager couldn't clearly explain what my raise would be or how it was determined. The utilization target of 91% for Senior Consultants is also extremely difficult to sustain while simultaneously contributing to internal initiatives, business development, and other non-billable expectations. Those competing priorities often result in long hours. With MC's, AD's, and D's asking saying this should only take you an hour or two - which isn't truthful at all. One of the most frustrating experiences was helping win contracts. While I'm proud of the team's accomplishments to get there, there was no financial recognition for the individuals who invested significant time into winning the work. It creates the feeling that Senior Consultants do much of the heavy lifting while higher levels receive most of the recognition and incentive compensation. They talk about a spot bonus of up to 10k, but no one believes it's real. Why would we trust at this point? The lack of transparency around compensation, career progression, and performance rewards is beginning to drive away talented people.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All