employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Interface People

Is this your company?

One of the worst jobs I've ever had, employed for over a year. - Software Developer Interface People Employee Review

1.0
Aug 3, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The environment and people are great, everyone is willing to go out of their way to help you. There are very intelligent people scattered throughout the company. Dress is casual. There are company meetings for developers where you can provide input and learn the best practices for developers. Flexibility.

Cons

There is absolutely no QA and as a result broken software gets pushed to the customers. If you're a developer be prepared to be doing support the majority of the time. The support team has no clue what they are doing and have become, simply, a ticket creation system. Management directives directly conflict with the agile scrum process that leadership is trying to fit their processes within. Managers rarely communicate with you unless there is negative feedback. Leadership has a lack of vision, so much so that they push for bugs to be put back into newer versions for "lack of backwards compatibility". Software is archaic at best. One of the teams is heavily reliant on a tool built internally that doesn't work, and that same broken "internal tool" is sold to customers. The way that software is developed causes support tickets to be generated continuously. Sales sets the due dates for contracts with no vision of company resources causing due dates for multiple projects to fall on the same day/week. PM's don't know what they are doing and as a result the developers have to add another hat to their list. Sourcing is very weak for a few teams. What is documentation? Because the frameworks used here are so old, there is very little room for career advancement. Huge learning curve and no training. Leadership has no desire to listen to the concerns of the developers. Company preys on new developers because "they need the experience and won't leave" Turnover rate is very high. Leadership claims that teams are "self managing" but will step in for the smallest things if they do not like it. Sticking to the Scrum processes is leadership's number one priority even if it is causing problems for a team's workflow. As a developer you will be wearing all of the hats and juggling multiple projects at any given time. Oncall shifts force you to stay awake all night during the work week and you are still expected to make it into the office on time.

Explore other reviews about Interface People

5.0
Mar 31, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very nice office environment. Great people to Work with

Cons

There is nothing bad about IPeople

2.0
Jun 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the people working there are genuinely nice and positive, team-oriented and supportive of the company’s mission. Even in upper management, there were individuals who seemed like genuinely good people. I never received much pushback when requesting time off, which I appreciated. They’re generally open to investing in tools or software you believe will help with your work, and there’s not much red tape around it. When the company is doing well, they like to portray themselves as generous—offering things like Christmas parties and other small perks. The benefits were decent. Not amazing, but respectable. They did encourage people to take time off when dealing with physical illness.

Cons

Upper management constantly shifted priorities, meetings, and expectations. They claimed to care about employee concerns but were clearly more focused on revenue and client acquisition, without reinvesting meaningfully in the team or QA processes. Frequent favoritism and nepotism—family members and friends of leadership held key roles, often treated with leniency or given insider info. Promises were often made but rarely kept. People would suddenly be let go without explanation, warning or discussion. So if you do end up working for them and suspect you're not in lock step with management, I'd recommend you get out before they show you the door. They used the “small company” excuse to justify disorganization, overwork, and lack of accountability. Reviews were lopsided, with a focus on criticism and peer critiques that leadership could read, creating an uncomfortable atmosphere. KPIs seemed more like tools to justify firing or salary stagnation rather than improve performance. Middle managers were often untrained and without leadership skills. Suggestions to improve workflow or morale were routinely dismissed. I don't think they meant ill in all circumstances, but the overall philosophy I found to be unintentionally toxic. I became more depressed and stressed working here than any other place in my career. I've never had 1 on 1's and performance reviews be so focused on all the ways my KPIs weren't 100% anywhere else. It instilled bad habits in me, making me constantly second guess myself, but then worry about the extra amount of time it was taking to go over it all again.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All