Brutal place to work - VP Operations Ormat Employee Review

1.0
Oct 15, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Location is nice - Reno, NV

Cons

Low pay, long hours. Expected to work 50+ hours a week with below average pay and painfull yslow apporvals from a few centralized decision makers allowed to make decsiions. Often helkd accountable for items you do not have authoruity to change Ormat leadership likes to complain but will not allow middle maanges to make independent decisions. It turns into a blame game and a very political place to work. Everyone sucks up to the Sr. VP's and they are new, so don't have a clue what's really going on but like many executives, are full of pride and hubris and believe they know everything. Ormat lacks integrity as a company. Broken promises and flat out lies are not something anyone should have to cope with professionally.

Explore other reviews about Ormat

5.0
Feb 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good support for employees and sites

Cons

Very corporate, lots of red tape

1.0
Mar 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some interesting technical projects and exposure to geothermal operations.

Cons

My experience at Ormat was deeply disappointing and ultimately unsustainable, largely due to structural and cultural issues within the organization. One example is how outdated and inefficient many internal processes are. Even for legitimate work-related expenses — such as field travel, training, or operational needs — employees are often expected to use their personal credit cards instead of a company card. Reimbursement then requires multiple layers of approvals across departments and can move extremely slowly. In practice, this means employees can end up carrying large expenses and even paying credit card interest before the company reimburses them, which is unreasonable for a professional organization of this size. The workplace culture is another serious concern. The environment can feel very closed and resistant to multicultural perspectives, despite the company promoting diversity and inclusion initiatives on paper. Numerous training sessions emphasize these values, but in reality many employees — including some managers — openly express frustration with those programs and dismiss them. In day-to-day interactions this sometimes translates into gossip, whispering about colleagues, and behaviors that can make certain employees feel isolated or targeted. In my experience and from what I observed among colleagues, gossip and internal politics are widespread, and issues involving disrespectful behavior are often minimized or ignored rather than addressed constructively. Instead of acknowledging cultural or management problems, employees who struggle in this environment may simply be labeled as “not a good fit.” Turnover is also very high. Many talented people leave the company after relatively short periods, and departures can be chaotic. Several former colleagues I worked with left under difficult circumstances, and the organization does little to reflect on why people are leaving. Overall, the company appears far more focused on protecting itself internally than on building a supportive, modern workplace where employees can succeed.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All