constant crisis-mode system - Coordinator Project HOME Employee Review

2.0
Dec 1, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission is truly admirable and inspiring. Coworkers were friendly, hardworking, and chill people. Very community-minded workplace with no pretense.

Cons

Both programs and administration are perpetually underfunded and understaffed, and yet Project HOME continues to expand rapidly every time a donor wants a new building or a new idea has caught the upper management's fancy. There are barely workable systems in place for an organization half its size. This means that staff often find themselves lurching from crisis to crisis. There is constant turnover as both operational and administrative staff get burned out.

avatar
Project HOME Response
5y
Thank you for posting a review and we’re sorry to hear that your experience was not up to standards. We would like to let you know we are investigating your feedback.

Explore other reviews about Project HOME

5.0
Jan 8, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everyone is a valued member of the community, residents, patients, students, community members, front line staff and executives alike. Everyone is dedicated to the mission, which is never deviated from, no matter the new project or initiative. Diverse group of staff, diversity of thought, diversity of experience both lived experience and education.

Cons

the business has experienced continuous growth

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are a lot of empathetic people that really mean well.

Cons

My experience at Project HOME was overwhelmingly negative. Leadership and management created an environment that I found adversarial, uncomfortable, and lacking in support. My direct manager was confrontational, unappreciative, and provided little guidance despite assigning significant responsibilities. Toward the end of my employment, I was placed in a high-pressure renovation project with only a few weeks’ notice and extremely high stakes. Responsibility was placed on me without the planning, resources, or support necessary to succeed. When problems arose, leadership appeared more interested in assigning blame than sharing accountability. Regular check-in meetings with my manager and the director often felt more like interrogations than collaborative discussions. Questions would be asked over Zoom, followed by prolonged periods of silence, creating an atmosphere that was intimidating and unnecessarily uncomfortable. Rather than receiving coaching or support, I frequently felt scrutinized. I also observed significant dysfunction and poor coordination between departments. Critical responsibilities that should have been handled by tenant services and support staff were often neglected or poorly executed, creating unnecessary risks and placing vulnerable residents in situations that should never have occurred. The lack of communication, accountability, and follow-through was deeply troubling. Despite completing a substantial amount of work during my tenure, there was little appreciation or recognition. I found the organization to be more focused on bureaucracy, optics, and internal messaging than on execution, employee development, and actually solving problems. The public image and mission promoted externally did not align with the culture I experienced internally. I would strongly encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the management culture and organizational effectiveness before accepting a position.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All