Toxic environment with poor pay and management disregard - Nurse Practitioner PsychPlus Employee Review

1.0
May 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Absolutely nothing is good about this place.

Cons

The pay is not great. You are expected to see 20-30 people a day!! 20 minute vists for follow up and 40 minute for new. You are constantly rushed, yelled at and belittled on a daily basis by patients and management. They fill out paperwork for patients as long as they pay their 150-300 fee even if provider disagrees. Had to work in a building with no AC for a while and the owner refused to even get us a fan. Hires people from out of the country for scheduling to try and save money. Owner expects everyone to be available 24/7. There is no personal life with this place. Owner does not care about patients or staff just how to make a quick buck. Really sad and pathetic. Good luck trying to take time off. They also try and not give your full PTO hours. Checked mine and they were o ly giving me part of what was owed. Slimy creeps!!

Explore other reviews about PsychPlus

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I am a big fan of the opportunities for growth and the level of clinical independence that comes with PsychPlus. I like flexibility with scheduling and ability to set your own working hours. The team is very supportive and works hard to answer clinical questions quickly. Although we are all working virtual and nationwide, the company has an "open door policy" throughout which extends from colleagues, to managers, to executives. I like the simplicity of charting through Galaxy and knowing that the team is constantly working to improve processes for both providers and staff.

Cons

At times there can be system glitches, but software team works hard to fix any issues in real time.

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The interview process was positive, and the leadership role appeared to offer meaningful opportunities for growth. Compensation and benefits were competitive on paper.

Cons

I was told credentialing would take approximately three months, but the process extended beyond that estimate. During that time, I was unable to begin working or complete meaningful onboarding, leaving me in limbo. Communication throughout the process was poor, and it was extremely difficult to obtain updates despite repeated follow-ups. The role was presented as a Clinical Director position, but the productivity expectations appeared difficult to reconcile with the leadership responsibilities. The required weekly patient caseload left little time for director-level duties such as staff support, program development, quality improvement, and other administrative responsibilities expected of a leadership role. When I ultimately accepted another position because I could no longer wait through the prolonged credentialing process, the company’s response was to point to a contract provision seeking $5,000 in damages related to credentialing and onboarding costs, despite the fact that I had never started working. Overall, the hiring process lacked transparency and communication, and the response to my resignation felt unnecessarily adversarial.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All