employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Risk Advisory Group

Engaged Employer

The worst experience of my life - Associate The Risk Advisory Group Employee Review

1.0
Sep 23, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Unfortunately, I have no positive comments to share. I’m writing this as I realize how damaged I’ve become, as a direct result of working for this organization.

Cons

Biased leadership It’s in your favor to be friends with the CEO The CEO and his hand picked team encourage poor management and leadership Staff are bullied and too afraid to stand up and call it out for fear of repercussions from the CEO and his friends who occupy senior roles This behavior breaks people, it’s toxic Working for TRAG should come with a mental health warning

Explore other reviews about The Risk Advisory Group

5.0
Jun 9, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was fortunate enough to pursue a career at Risk Advisory. I worked here for more than 10 years before I decided that it was time for a new chapter in my professional life. And I am not the only one: there are many people who decided to spend some of the most formative years of their professional careers at Risk Advisory. I am lucky that I was able to learn from many of them along the way. The professional support and friendship I experienced during my decade at the company — including once I decided to move on — is something that I’ll always be grateful for. Several years ago a former colleague of mine wrote in their review on this very website that Risk Advisory is a place for those with ideas and ambition and who are willing to demonstrate ownership and accountability. Back then I was still a rookie and didn’t quite understand what this meant. Looking back at this comment now, I couldn’t agree more. Starting as a senior associate, I ended my career at the company as a member of the senior management team, having worked in three different locations and in various positions along the way. I worked hard for this, no doubt, and it wasn’t always easy. But I was always surrounded by people who had a genuine interest in furthering my career, in helping me create opportunities and supporting me along the way. A word about the people — if it wasn’t for them, I wouldn’t have stayed as long as I did. I’ve made lifetime friends here and the knowledge, expertise and diversity represented by the entire staff is inspiring and fascinating.

Cons

The investigations sector is demanding, market-driven and fast-paced. Managing clients and their expectations can be difficult and even distracting at times. Providing fact-based, reliable and actionable intelligence takes time — but time is a precious good in an industry where clients want to make decisions quickly. The inherent conflict is par for the course in this sector and can create a stressful work environment. Risk Advisory — with its unwavering dedication to top quality — is no exception. Not everyone is made for working in this sector and you need to consider carefully if this is the right environment for you, your skills and expectations.

3
1.0
Jul 9, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Comprehensive health benefits and a generous annual leave policy. Many junior team members are highly intelligent, thoughtful, and collaborative. Strong potential among early-career staff, though their contributions are often undervalued by leadership.

Cons

During my time at the company as an analyst, I observed a high rate of turnover among analysts and associates, largely due to burnout, unmet expectations regarding career advancement, and a general lack of accountability from leadership. Work-life balance is a significant challenge. Associates are frequently expected to meet unrealistic deadlines, often at the expense of personal time. Requests to work evenings, weekends, holidays, and even while on vacation are not uncommon. When concerns are raised, employees may find themselves unfairly labeled as difficult or uncooperative. There is a noticeable gap in leadership effectiveness. Many managers appear more focused on personal advancement and loyalty than on fostering team development or delivering clear direction. Accountability for project outcomes tends to fall disproportionately on junior staff, while management often avoids responsibility for overpromising to clients or mismanaging expectations. Another area of concern is the lack of investment in investigative tools and resources, which significantly impacts the team’s ability to deliver high-quality work efficiently. Finally, compensation does not reflect the cost of living in the cities where the company operates. Pay disparities among employees at the same level are common, and performance bonuses for junior staff are modest—typically around 2.5% of base salary, even for top performers.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All