employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Voting Rights Lab

Is this your company?

Good work, good benefits, good people working to make improvements - Anonymous employee Voting Rights Lab Employee Review

4.0
May 1, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Voting Rights Lab is a powerful source of research and resources for the national voting rights movement. It has great connections to grassroots groups (i.e. actual voters) in a number of states, and that's important in this line of work. As a work environment, I believe that those in leadership positions care about their employees and want to see them succeed, although some are definitely better about that than others. Pay and benefits are generally strong, and everyone I know is able to maintain a good work/life balance. In some of the areas with the biggest concerns (operations and HR), strong hires have been made to try and address them, and I definitely see progress being made.

Cons

Organizational stability has been hard to come by at times. A lack of organizational direction has led to some missed opportunities and cross-department confusion, and the desire to "do more" has sometimes conflicted with staff capacity and Voting Rights Lab's actual strengths. Otherwise, turnover has been an issue.

Explore other reviews about Voting Rights Lab

5.0
Oct 16, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

WFH, state law and policy, legislative advocacy and partnerships. Full of very high performing and hard working colleagues.

Cons

I've had to get used to using Slack a lot. I love the flexibility of working from home, but I'm starting to wish for more face-to-face time with colleagues. VRL is working on creating more opportunities to get together.

1.0
Jan 2, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some people below top management who do fantastic work.

Cons

Agree with other reviewers: tyrannical, hostile leadership, no controls,, total chaos. This organization is unbelievably badly managed and top management refuses to admit mistakes or take responsibility for their actions. There is rampant discrimination especially by top management, and management hires their friends as consultants and board members. If donors found out how their money was being wasted/stolen they would be shocked. As other reviewers noted, there continues to be reportable federally noncompliant uses of staff time and money. There is some communication but never about important things affecting staff, only vague references and constant changes with no notice. A decision was made to transition to multiple new organizations; it was done abruptly to avoid liability from a public whistle-blower and discrimination lawsuit. Implementation of the new organizations was and still is a nightmare. Infrastructure isn't there, no support, very top-heavy. Operations decision-maker very suddenly left 2 months after the transition date with no notice or explanation. There has been a LOT of staff attrition in the past year. I don't see this organization surviving.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All