Engine reviews

3.8

67% would recommend to a friend

(789 total reviews)
avatar

Elia Wallen

76% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Engine has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 789 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Engine employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

789 reviews
5.0
Jul 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You can make a ton of money if you're effective at finding good accounts and put in the work. It's a very easy product to sell (it's free with no contracts) once you get the hang of it. The product itself is also constantly being approved. Top to bottom the people in Chicago are great on a personal level--directors, managers, reps, etc. Want to address a few myths I'm seeing in other reviews: You do not have to work beyond the required 8-5 schedule if you can budget your time well, find good accounts, and run your Zoom calls effectively. This would be even more manageable if management reduced the amount of mandatory internal calls that don't help drive revenue. They do not necessarily fire you for missing quota 2 months in a row. If you are at 6% consecutive months, yes, you're probably in the wrong job. If you miss the first month of ramp, which is $1,000 of revenue (compared to ~$120,000 fully ramped) and then miss again the next month, yes, that's probably a good indication that it's not a good fit. Speaking from experience, if you demonstrate you can do the job, they do not just fire you for a bad couple of months. They will also generally give you notice and deadlines if you're at risk of getting fired, even if they don't call it a PIP, although I've heard a couple reps swear that this was not the case for them. "Lead quality is bad" Yes, the top reps are not using the ~5 accounts Engine's automated "drip" system adds to your book of business in Salesforce every night. You have to find your own accounts. Spend an hour or two every day finding fresh accounts to call. That's part of the job. I see people complaining that they're judged too much by their "numbers" once they take the job or taking an off-the-cuff "healthy dose of anxiety" comment made half in jest out of context. Yes, welcome to sales. If you don't like being judged on a quota, I'm not sure why you're in this line of work. Leadership cares about you on a personal level, but I'm not sure what you expect if you're routinely missing your #. "Quota is attainable at first but then gets hard" Yeah, that's how ramp works. You don't get to bring in $100 in total profit margins for the company on hotel bookings every month for eternity and get paid $120,000/yr. If you find a company willing to permanently pay you 1000x what you produce in profit, please refer me. In theory, you can be at 100% of ramped quota by closing a $240,000 account ($20k/mo spender on hotels) every month if you get their full share of wallet and they're steady spenders (not seasonal or event-centric). $240,000 in annual hotel spend is roughly the average deal size reps are pursuing these days anyway, so think of it as closing one slightly above average size deal a month to stay in the ballpark of ramped quota. Obviously you want to go beyond that to max out accelerators and give yourself a cushion, but that's completely manageable. You can also offset 3 or 4 bad months with a single big customer. Most reps in Chicago are hitting their numbers still as they get towards being fully ramped--2 of 4 teams had every single rep hit last month, and the other 2 had most reps hitting. Don't be misled a few upset ex-employees who never even got close to reaching fully ramped status because they either didn't put in any effort or just couldn't put the pieces together.

Cons

In-office 4 days a week at 8am. Quota capped at 300%, even post-ramp. Never been at another company that operates that way. There are a few reps who have closed enough pipeline that their commission checks would not change between now and Thanksgiving if they went off the grid on a 3 month vacation starting tomorrow. Very weird to set up quota in a way that reduces the incentive to keep bringing in more business or, at the very least, incentivize sandbagging deals. The training & enablement functions are brutal--thank god they reduced the number of those reps had to attend every week. The people that run them are great on a personal level, but their work product is just not helpful. Wish they had listened to all the reps who pointed out that they were useless earlier instead of waiting for the CEO to join one for the first time ever and cut off the presentation 3 minutes in because it was so painful. Generally speaking, just too many internal calls and exercises that aren't helpful. The actual sales managers (as opposed to training, enablement, RevOps, etc.) know what they're doing; listen to them and you'll be fine. Some reps complained that we as an office weren't "collaborative" enough across teams, so they've tried several exercises in Chicago to appease these people. First they tried "Wacky Wednesday," which required everyone to switch seats for one day and sit next to reps on other teams (for those of us who keep useful resources pinned up at our desk, this was just an unnecessary inconvenience), then they transitioned to "scrums" where you spend the last hour of your Tuesday a couple times a month role playing in front of the entire office. No one I've spoken to enjoys them or finds them especially valuable. To the extent they are valuable, the goals could be achieved with a Slack message, a few minutes in daily team meetings that already happen, or in a 1:1 instead of these hour-long blocks with the entire office. If someone wants to put together an optional exercise like that, go nuts. Leadership mandates these things to appease a handful of people at the expense of everyone else. We have had visitors from other offices who found the courage to put 1:1 time on reps' calendars to pick their brains and share ideas. If visitors who have never met anyone in the office can do it, so can these people hellbent on forcing the entire office into an activity they don't find useful. There's not a rep in the office who wouldn't help or give advice if asked.

1.0
Jul 2, 2026

Fear-Based Culture

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Engine hires incredibly smart, driven people who genuinely care about building great products and solving difficult problems. The product challenges are complex, the hiring bar is high, and you'll have the opportunity to work alongside talented engineers, designers, and product managers who want to make an impact.

Cons

The biggest challenge isn't the people, it's a fear-based culture. Engine hires exceptionally talented people, but many operate from fear rather than confidence. Employees are encouraged to take ownership, yet in practice many decisions require excessive approval, mistakes often feel high stakes, and there is a persistent undercurrent of concern about job security. Over time, people stop asking, "What's best for the customer?" and start asking, "What's the safest decision for me?" That is not an environment where innovation thrives. Leadership communication often feels confrontational rather than collaborative. The tone set at the top influences the rest of the organization, creating an environment where people spend more time protecting themselves than solving problems together. Coaching frequently takes a back seat to criticism, and accountability can feel one-sided. Leadership frequently references "talent density" to explain performance expectations and turnover. However, it was difficult to reconcile that philosophy with seeing employees leave or be let go after only a few months, before they had a meaningful opportunity to learn a complex business, receive coaching, apply feedback, and demonstrate growth. High standards are important, but they should be matched with equally high standards for leadership, coaching, and employee development. There also appears to be significant turnover among leaders and directors. Frequent leadership changes make it difficult to build trust, maintain continuity, and execute a long-term strategy. Another pattern that stood out was how departures were communicated. Even when employees appeared to leave on their own, the message shared internally was often that the decision was "mutual." Over time, that can erode confidence in leadership transparency. Engine has the talent to build exceptional products. The culture simply doesn't allow many of those talented people to do their best work.

1.0
Jun 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

none. Do NOT be fooled by them in interviews. They are insane. If I had to pick one, high pay if you manage to last.

Cons

Managers here will make you feel like you personally wronged them and their entire bloodline. Nitpicky about everything, every single thing you do is tracked and ridiculed, and in the time I was there (not long) more than 5 good people were fired for missing their number for ONE MONTH or for not being a "culture fit." run for the hills. they do not care about their employees. they are chasing a number and don't care how they get there. so toxic I cried almost every single day. oh also zero care for work life balance. meetings routinely going past 5pm, getting ostracized for not staying later and arriving before work starts. I could probably go on for a while just don't work here

Viewing 1 - 3 of 789 Reviews

Glassdoor has 814 Engine reviews submitted anonymously by Engine employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Engine is right for you.