The hiring process was NOT good. The first round was a 60 minute on-site online test. One had to solve 2 questions. I completed the 1st question and got a runtime error on 2nd question when I ran out of time. The recruiter asked me to leave for the day since both questions were mandatory and my approach for the 2nd question was incorrect. I asked him if I could have a review for the 2nd question because I thought that was right. Then, the engineer reviewing my code came in and I explained to him how the code was supposed to work and why I was getting Runtime error. He argued with me for about 5 minutes and came u with the following conclusions: 1. My code was not readable. 2. My code was not using optimal data structure. 3. We expect not only the correct solution. We expect the most optimal solution. 4. I dont care if you can write code, analyse the complexity and provide the most optimal solution, this code does not look good. 5. You are using too many if blocks. You are bound to miss somethiing. I told him I am using these if blocks for error-checking and corner cases. After all this, he asked me to redo my 2nd question and I said I was NOT willing and terminated the process. In hindsight, the whole attitude of the reviewer was to find out any silly reasons he could to reject my solution and accept that I had a working algorithm and solution. These people have a notion of a question and answer and if you get the answer they have thought beforehand, then you are a good fit for this company.