Netskope Interview Questions

Five rounds of coding challenge: 1 With Head of the Business Unit 2 rounds with SDETs 2 rounds with Developers At every stage, I have enjoyed myself, as I have been pushed to bring a better version of myself. which helps the candidate to understand what the company is looking for. The recruiter was very diligent in communication and follow-ups. Keeps the candidate up to date feedbacks.

I had given 5 rounds of the interview and didn't get feedback till next 6 days and the I called to recruiter to get my feedback and he said out of 5 rounds 1 round was not good and you are not selected. Note : As far as i know all my interview rounds went very well but please don't decide the result on any one of the rounds. If this is the case, there should be an elimination round. Why Candidate should spent another couple of days even you have decided to reject the candidate

A friendly interviewer discusses and asks questions. I know how to resolve this issue, unfortunately I didn't notice the time and have too much non-leetcode discussion and unable to finish it on time.

Had a total of 5 rounds. All rounds had 1 coding question, related to stack, arrays, string. Testing acumen, product architecture etc were the other focus areas. I had a good discussion at each round and was expecting this to turn out positive, but got a regret mail after 4 days. There was no discussion on feedback, which makes me feel like I wasted my time at the discussions.

Had technical screening round followed by 4 technical rounds .. and then another cultural fit (which was technical + tehy telling abt company culture.. based on culture description.. did not seem like a good fit.. thus declined) One of the interviewers was rude.. which was a precursor to my reservations for culture fit.. and the round for culture fit confirmed the suspicion Many times they would say.. don't be offended if some1 comes as rude.. its for ur growth!!

The HR was prompt with her replies. The issue was the interviewer’s attitude. Very disrespectful and giving unnecessary attitude( the manager was kind interviewer was just another engineer). preferred theoretical solution than practical. I was able to answer most of the questions but they were preferring theoritical on most which is weird. One example: for troubleshooting a simple issue she was expecting with respect to OSI layer. Also getting agitated and saying “Don’t tell me what xyz is I know what it is”. Also scanning/interrogating through my resume like I put fake experience. I didn’t like this generalization and judgemental attitude. Definitely dodged a bullet. To prepare study Linux and networking very well. Troubleshooting questions. Not much scripting. and pray your interviewer is non-desi(for my desi folks).

The interview process was pathetic. There were 6 rounds of interviews which went for about 2 months .. I think they liked me as the hiring manager confirmed that they liked me but due to changes in their organization, it might take some time to release the offer.. After another 2 months, it got rejection confirmation .... I later got to know that I was a backup candidate and was lied to for 2 months and they keep me on hold saying that due to organizational changes, there is a delay.. Didn't expect this from a pre-IPO firm.. Ethics and Integrity should be at first!

Received a voicemail from one of their recruiters about scheduling 30 minutes for an initial discussion on the role and my background. I missed the call since I was at work but noticed the google calendar invite that was basically scheduling the interview for me without my consent. That's pretty bold to just schedule something in the middle of a weekday instead of asking for availability. I then replied via email with a few questions before PTO is scheduled, to talk to Netskope during business hours. Some red flags through me off based on that calendar invite so I figured it was time to scrutinize this company further. The recruiter never responded after the email and I sent a text message withdrawing my candidacy since they could not answer simple questions. It is clear these businesses think they are in the driver seat for talent when they are not.