Certainly! Here’s an expanded 50-word version of your selection process description: The Redbus selection process comprised four stages: an initial Online Assessment to evaluate problem-solving skills, followed by two elimination-based Technical Rounds focused on coding, DBMS, and core concepts. The process concluded with an HR Round to assess communication skills, cultural fit, and overall suitability for the role.

1. Technical Round with Team Lead: 2. Managerial Round 3. Final Round with QA Practice Head Basic programming ,data structures, all the rounds were like technical. They expected a working code which has had written. 2nd round I was asked to optimise the code written and do test th program.basic questions asked on Testing methodology,which was mere a formality I believe. 1. Technical Round with Team Lead: The first round involved writing a working solution to reverse (swipe) a string. I was also asked some basic questions on data structures, along with a logical puzzle. The round was straightforward and focused primarily on coding ability and problem-solving skills. 2. Managerial Round: This round included a programming task related to identifying and handling duplicates in a string, with an emphasis on optimizing the solution. It also included some follow-up questions on design approach and optimization techniques. 3. Final Round with QA Practice Head: Unfortunately, this round did not leave a good impression. It began abruptly with technical questions, without any greetings. The interviewer eager to counter question jump without fully understanding my responses, and the conversation felt disorganized. What I found particularly inappropriate was the line of questioning around my personal background , castism and family’s financial situation, which I felt was unprofessional and irrelevant to the job role