Pros
Schedule flexibility. Liked the team I worked with (does not extend to leadership).
Cons
Leadership frequently emphasizes that the company is a "family" and that layoffs are not part of its approach during difficult business conditions. However, the reality has felt very different, with ongoing reductions happening in a quiet and opaque manner that seem inconsistent with those messages. A few years ago, the company felt innovative, employee-focused, and headed in a positive direction. It was genuinely a fun place to work, and there was excitement about where the organization was going. Unfortunately, the company appears to be moving in the opposite direction today, with declining morale, increasing turnover, and a growing disconnect between leadership and employees. The company often spends significant resources on initiatives that appear disconnected from employee needs while being reluctant to approve expenditures that would meaningfully improve the employee experience. There is a noticeable gap between leadership's stated priorities and where resources are ultimately allocated. While leadership encourages employees to share their opinions and promotes a culture where everyone is supposedly valued, the organizational structure is highly hierarchical. Constructive feedback and dissenting viewpoints are not always welcomed, and employees may feel discouraged from questioning decisions. In some cases, employees may perceive negative consequences for challenging leadership decisions or raising concerns. The HR department does not consistently function as a trusted advocate for employees. Many employees view HR primarily as a mechanism for protecting leadership and the organization rather than addressing legitimate employee concerns. This has contributed to a culture where employees may be hesitant to raise issues for fear of repercussions. Decision-making tends to be extremely fast, often without sufficient planning or consideration of downstream impacts. At the same time, follow-through and execution after major decisions are frequently lacking, creating confusion and frustration throughout the organization. The company also promotes employee wellness as a core value, but many of the programs, resources, and benefits that previously supported wellness have been reduced or eliminated without meaningful replacements. This creates a significant gap between the company's messaging and the actual employee experience. Communication across the organization is often ineffective and poorly coordinated. Internal messaging can be inconsistent, important changes are not always communicated clearly, and the company's broader communication and digital strategy appear disjointed. Even basic website and communication functions often feel outdated, confusing, or poorly executed. Overall, there is a recurring pattern of leadership messaging not aligning with employee reality, which has contributed to declining trust, reduced morale, and concerns about the company's long-term direction.
