Pros
The main benefit of working here is the ability to work fully remote. This flexibility can be helpful for employees who value location independence. The equity firm that purchased this company is clueless about what really goes on here.
Cons
Beyond remote work, there are limited advantages. Career growth, compensation, and overall support are lacking compared to similar companies. The compensation is very low in all departments and no stock options. Leadership within the marketing department lacks professionalism and maturity. Decisions and attitudes toward employees in other departments often appear to be influenced by gossip and secondhand information rather than direct observation or measurable performance. This creates a toxic environment where trust and collaboration suffer. Some managers seem disengaged and uninvested beyond collecting a paycheck, which impacts accountability and team effectiveness. There is also noticeable dysfunction between business development and account executive roles. In my experience, certain individuals in business development displayed resentment after not being promoted, leading to unproductive competition rather than support and working with their managers to get good people fired so they can move into their positions of the sales reps they have envy and prejudice towards in my view. This undermines teamwork and actively interferes with others’ success. I observed situations where employees were targeted or set up to fail through misleading false gossip spread by BDR reps and in my opinion shady management oversight. Those who raise concerns are often portrayed as the problem while the people who cause the problems are portrayed as the victims. Overall, morale is low, and many capable employees leave as a result. In my personal opinion, gossip and misinformation are common across multiple departments. I observed situations where closely aligned managers and representatives—particularly within business development—appeared to spread negative and unverified hearsay about account executives. This behavior seemed to influence broader sales team sentiment and, at times, resulted in individuals being unfairly isolated or targeted. There is also a lack of professionalism during internal meetings. On more than one occasion, senior marketing leadership appeared unaware that their microphones were not muted while joining calls with executive leadership. Comments made quietly—apparently intended to be private—were audible to others on the call, including disparaging remarks about sales representatives. This undermines trust, reflects poor meeting etiquette, and creates unnecessary tension between teams. Overall, these behaviors contribute to a hostile and divisive environment where perception and gossip can outweigh actual performance.In my personal opinion, management practices in some areas feel unethical and lacking transparency. The culture can resemble a “locker room” mentality, where gossip, favoritism, and informal alliances take precedence over professionalism and accountability. This environment may appeal to some, but it can be uncomfortable and discouraging for employees who value integrity, fairness, and respectful collaboration.
