Drastic Changes needed in order to survive (perspective of an ASIC engineer) - Senior ASIC Engineer AMD Employee Review

2.0
Aug 14, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Opportunity to work on some really exciting cutting edge technology as well as learn and hone your skills. Current CEO genuinely cares about the company and is not just there to bide time before deploying the golden parachute. Current executives are starting to be aware of the problems (outlined in the two sections below) and may be able to turn the company around.

Cons

Non-existent raises and bonuses (not existent because of how poorly the company is currently performing). Huge discrepancy between people when it comes to responsibilities and compensation. You may be working like a dog and be responsible for a number of things, all while getting paid less than a person (same role and title, but different team) who is doing 20% of what you do while getting paid more. Frustrating lack of technical leadership. Most of the middle management really lacks technical skills which is unacceptable for an engineering company. (Many ASIC managers are not capable of any technical contribution and some lack understanding of some absolutely fundamental concepts). As a result, a lot of managers solve their problems by simply throwing more people at the issues. This empire building attitude creates large teams with a lot of weak engineers instead of lean, agile teams with strong engineers. During my past years with the company I have seen far more good people leave than join. A lot of groups have family (mafia) like relationships within them. While this may be a good thing because people have a lot of friends at the office, it does not promote a healthy, critical look at the teams (i.e. everyone is family; there are no strong or weak people). HR heavily influences promotion cycles which is highly demotivating and leads to a "government job" attitude at the workplace. Why work harder when you'll get your promotion anyways after x-number of years? This, again, does not encourage good people to stay at the company and is not a trait of a high-tech business.People are far more interested in keeping their job than seeing the company succeed.

Explore other reviews about AMD

4.0
Apr 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It's a big company. So, a lot of great benefits and high pay. Also, a lot of opportunity for career advancement and internal transfers if a particular job/team doesn't fit (to avoid losing RSUs). Plus, they're not too hard on you regarding performance since all the performance reviews are qualitative rather than quantitative (that could be both a pro and a con, honestly).

Cons

It's a big company. So, a lot of bureaucracy. They get in the way of themselves requiring endless approvals for spending. Also small organizations within AMD being territorial about their particular domain rather than being as open as possible inhibits rapid progress. Also, pushing for "diversity and inclusion" is racist. They should ignore race, not try to have a representative sampling of the population. I give them a low score there because DEI is racist. But not minimal because it's only something the HR dept cares about, normal employees effectively ignore race from what I can tell. So even if management is woke, the company (the individuals) are not.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All