Great people, blind leadership - User Experience Manager AnswerLab Employee Review

2.0
May 20, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The employees at AnswerLab are amazing - intelligent, driven, and helpful across the board on both the Research and Research Ops teams. Everyone works together to make projects as successful as possible. I formed friendships with two of my best friends while working at AnswerLab. What more need I say about the people! On the other side, the Sales (strategy) team as a whole are only driven; they are actually the opposite of helpful (see below). There are ~3 shining exceptions to this rule on the East Coast strategy team. HR is caring and really tries to improve researcher quality of life.

Cons

AnswerLab exclusively promotes people (across the org) who: - Put in well more than 40 hours a week - despite the ongoing narrative that this is not how execs want employees to work - Smile and nod to everything - Do not form independent opinions, do not offer dissenting viewpoints, and do not attempt to poke holes in new ideas Two of the six people in Exec roles refuse to hear negative words of any kind, which leads to barriers against improving processes and improving employee performance and quality of life across the org. Strategy (sales) runs the ranch at AnswerLab, to the detriment of the entire company. They work without any parameters and they are not required to help in the project success in any way other than to sell it. (Sales will disagree with this, but I challenge 90% of them to tell me even one other way they assist in project success.) This means that Sales makes all scoping decisions, agrees to difficult deliverables and (literally) impossible timelines, but are "on the hook" for none of it. When clients push too hard, go out of scope, or ask for unreasonable things, it causes the project costs to skyrocket out of control, which the Research dept is blamed for. Sales are not asked to take responsibility for pushing back on unreasonable requests, instead making the Research team do it. This means that Research: - works under unreasonable deadlines and are unsupported in pushing back - as a consequence of the above, works way harder and longer than should be required based on the original project scope - is left to tell the client "no" when demands are unreasonable. this has led to very rare cases where the client doesn't want to work with the researcher anymore, and sales REFUSES TO STAFF THE RESEARCHER on anything new - when in fact it is their fault - gets blamed when a project is unprofitable because they had to put in extra work that sales agreed to without adding hours or costs to the project. Sales is accountable for nothing at the company, but they get a HEFTY sales commission. No one in the Research dept sees a cent of the (unnecessarily large) commission. In fact, the ones doing the least work make the most money because the huge accounts run themselves; they don't have to sell, they just have to pick up the phone. When you have a company where one department creates the work, refuses to be accountable for the work, and walks away with 5x (or more) the salary of the Researcher, you get resentment and people leaving the company for being worked too hard, being unrecognized for work, or being blamed for things beyond their control.

avatar
AnswerLab Response
4y
(Response by Kate Taplin, SVP UX Strategy) Thank you for your review. I am so glad to hear that you formed long-lasting friendships while at AnswerLab and that your experience with our culture, DEI efforts and comp/benefits resulted in your four-star rating. I am deeply sorry that your experience working with the sales team wasn’t as positive, and I am now concerned that the experience may have contributed to your departure. I wouldn’t want that for you or any of our other Researchers. The mission of our Strategy practice is to be in service to the research team to help the company grow and provide more opportunities for bringing our research to clients. We have intentionally separated scoping to be on the sales team to allow the researchers to focus on what they do best per their request. Clearly there is more work to do to make sure everyone gets the benefit of having the sales team scope better. In April, AnswerLab launched two specific initiatives; one is focused on how to prevent and correct it when something goes wrong in the sales process, and the other is focused on setting up a framework to make sure we go after the right work. This effort is being led by representatives from Research, Strategy and our People & Culture team to ensure we are taking everyone’s experience into consideration. Your feedback is helping me to see that we should open this initiative up to others at AnswerLab who would like to be part of this change effort, and I commit to doing that soon. It also saddens me that you didn’t feel comfortable reaching out as my door, and the doors of the Strategy leaders, are always open. AnswerLab actively seeks to build a culture of transparency, and I believe I am welcoming of new ideas and different perspectives. I was delighted to see so many OKRs come in from people across the organization this year to help improve the company and hope that new AnswerLabbers can use this as a forum for change. Based on your post, I will give thought to other ways I can show my sincere interest in getting input on making AnswerLab a great place to work through change and improvements. I understand your perception of compensation has led to some resentment, and I wish I had the opportunity to further share my perspective on the structure. The door is open for that conversation too, and people can also reach out to People & Culture if they have comp related questions. Thanks again, your candor caused me to be more introspective, and I appreciate the time you took to provide feedback about your experience.

Explore other reviews about AnswerLab

5.0
Aug 31, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team, work enviroment and flexbility

Cons

low pay, lack of promotion

2.0
Mar 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Note: I put my own ideas into an AI agent to remove personality and ensure anonymity. Despite broader organizational challenges, colleagues are a clear strength. There is a strong sense of camaraderie and a genuine willingness to collaborate, with teams often supporting one another through periods of uncertainty. Several remaining senior leaders from earlier phases of the company demonstrate an awareness of employee needs and are actively working to preserve elements of culture, work/life balance, and internal relationships. Transparency does exist within the organization, though it can depend on where and how information is accessed. The role offers the fundamentals many candidates seek—fully remote work, with varying degrees of schedule flexibility depending on position. Day-to-day management is generally supportive, with many managers fostering a collaborative environment and stepping in to help when needed.

Cons

Multiple rounds of layoffs have had a lasting impact on morale and internal culture, with limited visible effort from leadership to address the fallout. The company’s direction appears heavily driven by investment priorities, resulting in frequent strategic shifts, overpromising, and significant pressure on sales and delivery teams to execute against evolving and often unrealistic expectations. Leadership decisions tend to favor alignment with board-level vision over employee stability, long-term growth, or organizational trust when those priorities are in tension. Operationally, overlapping decision-makers and unclear ownership create unnecessary complexity, slowing execution and making day-to-day work more difficult than it needs to be. While leadership promotes openness to challenge, in practice, differing perspectives are often dismissed—particularly when they conflict with existing assumptions or strategic narratives. There is also a strong tendency to introduce new tools, platforms, and processes as solutions, rather than critically reassessing core strategy or acknowledging when current approaches may not be effective. Major initiatives, such as rebranding efforts, appear to be based on optimistic assumptions about business impact, leading to significant resource investment in work that does not clearly drive revenue. Overall, this misalignment between strategy, execution, and measurable outcomes creates ongoing strain and uncertainty, which prospective employees should carefully consider.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All